← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
4
Lines priced
73
Best bets
1
Leans
1
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Best Bets

Juraj Slafkovský
MTL @ TBL · 6:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 2.5
Price+105
Model51.2%
Book45.5%
EV+5.0%
Fair-105
Stake1.2%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 2.31 SOG · 19.7 min (3.5 PP) role change W 2 SOG · +1.05u

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
TBL vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +110 55.8% 55.6% 3.00 21.1 (4.3) — -7.4% 4 SOG
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 55.3% 1.73 15.9 (3.4) — -11.2% 0 SOG
TBL vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 51.7% 1.83 17.8 (1.0) — -5.3% 0 SOG
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 48.8% 2.31 19.7 (3.5) UNDER best +5.0% W 2 SOG · +1.05u
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 48.6% 1.74 25.4 (3.7) — -5.2% 6 SOG
TBL vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -135 45.9% 46.8% 1.65 14.7 (1.0) — -4.0% 3 SOG
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +110 -145 44.6% 43.6% 1.45 22.8 (0.6) — -8.4% 2 SOG
TBL vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +100 -135 46.5% 43.1% 3.17 19.9 (4.5) — -13.7% 5 SOG
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +110 -150 44.3% 43.0% 1.45 15.1 (1.2) — -9.7% 0 SOG
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +100 -135 46.5% 42.7% 3.10 18.6 (3.6) — -14.6% 1 SOG
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 41.7% 2.27 20.7 (3.6) — -10.4% 2 SOG
TBL vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +115 -150 43.7% 41.3% 3.11 21.3 (3.3) — -11.3% 1 SOG
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +135 -180 39.8% 40.5% 1.44 13.4 (1.3) — -4.9% 2 SOG
TBL vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 40.1% 2.35 18.6 (4.0) — -5.8% 4 SOG
MTL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +145 -195 38.2% 37.2% 1.27 13.3 (1.4) — -8.8% 2 SOG
TBL vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +155 -210 36.7% 37.2% 1.33 14.4 (1.0) — -5.2% 2 SOG
TBL vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +130 -175 40.6% 36.3% 2.76 21.7 (4.4) — -16.5% 4 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 59.1% 2.05 15.5 (2.1) — -7.1% 2 SOG
BOS @ BUF 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 58.4% 1.95 18.6 (2.5) — -8.3% 1 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 56.1% 1.92 16.4 (1.6) — -6.5% 1 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 52.7% 1.83 16.4 (3.2) — -5.2% 1 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 50.7% 2.51 16.4 (3.1) — -13.1% 3 SOG
BOS @ BUF 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 50.2% 1.79 24.6 (2.8) — -4.1% 1 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 50.0% 2.55 19.4 (1.9) — -11.5% 3 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 3.5 -135 +100 53.5% 49.8% 3.47 20.0 (3.5) — -13.4% 6 SOG
BOS @ BUF 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 49.7% 1.63 15.7 (2.6) — -8.9% 2 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -115 -115 50.0% 48.0% 2.49 23.6 (3.6) — -10.2% 6 SOG
BOS @ BUF 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +110 -150 44.3% 45.3% 1.60 16.8 (1.6) — -4.9% 2 SOG
BOS @ BUF 6:30 PM CT 3.5 +105 -140 45.5% 43.7% 3.31 20.5 (3.2) — -10.5% 0 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +120 -165 42.2% 42.6% 1.52 21.1 (0.5) — -6.3% 3 SOG
BOS @ BUF 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 40.7% 2.34 14.7 (1.7) — -6.4% 5 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +135 -185 39.6% 40.4% 1.45 22.4 (1.9) — -5.0% 4 SOG
BOS @ BUF 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 40.4% 2.26 18.1 (2.7) — -9.1% 1 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +120 -160 42.5% 39.8% 1.30 21.9 (0.2) — -12.4% 1 SOG
BUF vs BOS 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 39.5% 2.28 16.2 (3.4) — -7.1% 0 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 58.2% 1.97 23.6 (1.4) — -7.5% 1 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 57.1% 1.89 17.5 (2.6) — -9.4% 3 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 56.5% 1.81 24.5 (2.8) — -10.3% 1 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 54.8% 1.79 15.7 (1.3) — -9.9% 3 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 53.8% 1.75 21.9 (1.3) — -9.1% 4 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 51.7% 1.80 17.9 (1.1) — -5.1% 5 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 2.5 -125 -105 52.0% 51.7% 2.78 17.4 (3.6) — -7.0% 3 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 50.7% 1.69 22.5 (0.6) — -8.8% 1 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 2.5 -125 -105 52.0% 50.4% 2.61 19.8 (3.0) — -9.3% 1 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -110 -125 48.5% 48.0% 1.62 21.2 (1.3) — -8.4% 2 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 47.9% 1.67 16.5 (1.4) — -6.5% 2 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 +100 -135 46.5% 46.8% 1.62 14.2 (1.2) — -6.3% 1 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 44.0% 2.31 19.7 (2.9) — -12.0% 3 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 42.4% 3.19 21.1 (3.6) — -11.0% 1 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 42.2% 2.18 19.5 (3.3) — -13.6% 2 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 40.4% 2.19 19.8 (3.5) — -11.1% 1 SOG
VGK vs UTA 8:30 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 39.1% 2.14 15.9 (3.6) — -12.1% 1 SOG
UTA @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 3.5 +130 -170 40.9% 34.8% 2.58 17.9 (2.8) UNDER lean +3.5% L 5 SOG · -1.00u
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 60.8% 2.06 16.8 (1.4) — -8.1% 1 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 59.3% 2.10 18.1 (1.6) — -5.8% 1 SOG
LAK @ COL 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +120 57.2% 54.4% 2.73 20.5 (2.5) — -10.6% 4 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.8% 2.86 22.1 (4.0) — -7.8% 5 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.2% 1.79 18.6 (0.7) — -8.8% 3 SOG
LAK @ COL 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 52.9% 2.74 19.3 (2.9) — -9.3% 1 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 50.9% 2.60 23.8 (3.5) — -11.4% 3 SOG
LAK @ COL 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 50.4% 1.82 20.5 (2.8) — -3.8% 0 SOG
LAK @ COL 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 50.1% 1.83 20.2 (2.7) — -2.3% 2 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -125 48.5% 49.8% 1.77 23.3 (2.4) — -4.9% 0 SOG
LAK @ COL 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 48.1% 2.65 20.3 (3.4) — -6.2% 1 SOG
LAK @ COL 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 47.1% 1.61 15.9 (1.0) — -8.1% 1 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 46.9% 1.44 17.3 (0.2) — -14.0% 2 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 44.6% 2.50 16.2 (3.6) — -6.4% 1 SOG
LAK @ COL 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -150 43.7% 43.4% 2.41 18.4 (1.2) — -6.8% 3 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 42.0% 2.35 17.0 (3.0) — -7.7% 4 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -190 38.9% 40.4% 2.43 19.7 (3.1) — -3.0% 3 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 4.5 +125 -165 41.7% 40.4% 4.09 22.4 (4.0) — -9.1% 4 SOG
LAK @ COL 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 40.2% 2.18 20.1 (1.7) — -11.5% 6 SOG
COL vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 37.8% 2.10 20.7 (0.9) — -11.2% 2 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.