← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
5
Lines priced
71
Best bets
0
Leans
1
Updated
Oct 19, 6:02 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
PIT @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +150 62.5% 62.3% 2.14 15.1 (1.8) — -6.5% 3 SOG
CBJ vs PIT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 59.9% 2.04 14.8 (1.8) — -6.9% 5 SOG
PIT @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 57.6% 1.97 16.1 (0.2) — -6.4% 2 SOG
PIT @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 56.0% 1.80 12.6 (0.5) — -9.0% 2 SOG
PIT @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +115 56.3% 55.3% 2.79 19.0 (2.4) — -7.8% 1 SOG
CBJ vs PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 52.8% 2.74 18.5 (2.7) — -8.1% 3 SOG
PIT @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 52.4% 2.76 19.9 (3.1) — -7.3% 0 SOG
PIT @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 51.3% 2.48 22.2 (2.9) — -12.1% 2 SOG
CBJ vs PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -125 -105 52.0% 49.7% 2.52 17.2 (2.4) — -10.5% 0 SOG
PIT @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +100 -135 46.5% 46.0% 3.43 20.5 (3.1) — -8.0% 3 SOG
CBJ vs PIT 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +100 -130 46.9% 45.8% 3.36 26.4 (2.9) — -8.5% 4 SOG
CBJ vs PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 45.6% 2.53 18.8 (2.7) — -6.5% 2 SOG
CBJ vs PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 44.5% 2.29 16.7 (1.6) — -11.1% 1 SOG
CBJ vs PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 43.8% 2.48 18.7 (2.3) — -5.9% 4 SOG
PIT @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +135 -185 39.6% 37.6% 2.92 18.3 (2.7) — -11.7% 1 SOG
WSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +150 62.5% 61.2% 1.99 23.8 (3.1) — -8.2% 2 SOG
COL vs WSH 8:00 PM CT 3.5 -145 +110 55.4% 58.6% 4.56 23.9 (3.9) — -1.0% 0 SOG
WSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 57.8% 1.70 18.4 (1.5) — -11.8% 2 SOG
WSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 55.8% 1.93 17.5 (2.7) — -5.7% 1 SOG
COL vs WSH 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -160 +120 57.5% 55.2% 2.69 23.9 (3.7) — -10.4% 3 SOG
COL vs WSH 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 54.0% 2.11 18.5 (3.5) — -1.1% 1 SOG
COL vs WSH 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 -105 52.5% 53.2% 1.87 23.6 (1.5) — -5.8% 2 SOG
COL vs WSH 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 50.3% 2.94 21.6 (3.9) — -1.8% 1 SOG
COL vs WSH 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 45.6% 2.80 22.7 (3.4) — +0.3% 1 SOG
COL vs WSH 8:00 PM CT 3.5 +130 -175 40.6% 41.8% 3.44 23.4 (4.0) — -3.9% 1 SOG
WSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 39.9% 2.74 17.3 (4.1) — -16.3% 1 SOG
WSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 39.3% 2.16 18.6 (2.5) — -9.6% 1 SOG
WSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 37.9% 2.00 17.5 (1.9) — -12.8% 2 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 59.8% 1.92 14.8 (1.6) — -8.8% 2 SOG
NSH @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 58.9% 1.95 21.1 (1.5) — -7.5% 3 SOG
NSH @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 58.4% 2.95 24.2 (3.4) — -8.2% 3 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 58.4% 1.90 24.5 (2.3) — -8.3% 3 SOG
NSH @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 57.1% 2.00 19.7 (3.0) — -4.9% 2 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 56.9% 1.94 17.7 (2.8) — -6.4% 1 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 56.1% 1.99 17.3 (2.6) — -5.3% 1 SOG
NSH @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +120 57.2% 54.8% 2.70 17.1 (3.1) — -9.8% 3 SOG
NSH @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 51.5% 2.62 18.3 (3.6) — -10.3% 1 SOG
NSH @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 3.5 -135 +105 54.1% 51.1% 3.43 18.9 (3.3) — -11.1% 1 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 46.8% 2.46 23.8 (2.9) — -8.6% 4 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 46.3% 2.50 19.4 (2.2) — -7.4% 4 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 45.5% 2.38 18.5 (2.7) — -8.9% 3 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 3.5 +115 -155 43.4% 42.0% 3.16 18.5 (2.8) — -9.7% 4 SOG
CGY vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -155 42.8% 42.0% 2.31 16.6 (1.1) — -7.7% 4 SOG
UTA vs VGK 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +140 60.9% 60.4% 2.05 17.5 (2.4) — -7.0% 2 SOG
VGK @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +140 60.9% 59.6% 1.94 17.4 (3.1) — -8.1% 3 SOG
UTA vs VGK 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 59.0% 1.97 16.0 (1.2) — -6.3% 3 SOG
VGK @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 58.4% 1.90 22.6 (1.8) — -8.2% 0 SOG
UTA vs VGK 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 58.3% 1.82 23.7 (2.1) — -9.4% 2 SOG
VGK @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 58.1% 1.81 22.1 (1.5) — -9.6% 2 SOG
UTA vs VGK 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 56.7% 1.93 15.8 (1.0) — -6.7% 1 SOG
UTA vs VGK 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 55.7% 1.95 16.2 (2.0) — -6.0% 1 SOG
UTA vs VGK 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +100 53.5% 53.8% 1.87 15.7 (1.2) — -6.3% 3 SOG
UTA vs VGK 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -125 -110 51.5% 50.5% 2.61 18.8 (2.5) — -9.1% 2 SOG
VGK @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +105 54.1% 49.7% 2.26 15.7 (2.2) UNDER lean +3.1% W 1 SOG · +1.05u
VGK @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 3.5 -115 -115 50.0% 47.8% 3.34 20.3 (3.3) — -10.6% 3 SOG
UTA vs VGK 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -130 47.5% 45.8% 2.39 16.8 (2.3) — -10.7% 3 SOG
VGK @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 40.8% 2.10 16.8 (1.8) — -12.3% 4 SOG
VGK @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 40.4% 2.22 22.2 (2.8) — -9.1% 1 SOG
ANA vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 61.0% 2.08 16.5 (2.5) — -6.9% 0 SOG
ANA vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 60.4% 2.02 16.4 (2.1) — -7.8% 3 SOG
DET @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 59.0% 1.90 13.6 (1.6) — -9.1% 0 SOG
DET @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 58.9% 2.97 18.1 (3.3) — -8.3% 4 SOG
ANA vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 58.8% 1.79 19.4 (2.5) — -10.3% 2 SOG
DET @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 58.7% 1.89 23.4 (3.1) — -8.6% 2 SOG
DET @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 53.8% 2.89 18.4 (3.7) — -6.3% 2 SOG
ANA vs DET 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 49.2% 2.50 18.6 (2.5) — -9.7% 5 SOG
ANA vs DET 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +100 -135 46.5% 44.4% 3.25 18.3 (2.4) — -11.1% 3 SOG
ANA vs DET 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -150 43.7% 43.2% 2.39 17.4 (2.4) — -7.1% 2 SOG
ANA vs DET 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 42.2% 2.01 13.1 (1.9) — -15.6% 1 SOG
DET @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +115 -150 43.7% 42.1% 3.16 20.2 (3.8) — -9.4% 0 SOG
DET @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 40.6% 2.25 18.2 (3.5) — -8.7% 2 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.