|
STL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-135 |
+100 |
53.5% |
55.4% |
1.99 |
19.1 (2.6) |
— |
-3.6% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.26/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.21/60
- EV ice share
- 29%
- PP share
- 53%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.92
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 57.6% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -124 / +124
|
|
TBL vs STL 6:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-135 |
+100 |
53.5% |
52.7% |
1.79 |
14.4 (3.2) |
— |
-8.3% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.37/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.52/60
- EV ice share
- 22%
- PP share
- 63%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.97
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 51.8% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -111 / +111
|
|
STL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-110 |
-120 |
49.0% |
52.4% |
1.93 |
19.8 (2.6) |
— |
0.0% |
0 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 5.68/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.77/60
- EV ice share
- 30%
- PP share
- 54%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.92
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 56.5% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -110 / +110
|
|
TBL vs STL 6:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-115 |
-115 |
50.0% |
50.7% |
1.75 |
17.4 (1.4) |
— |
-5.3% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.14/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.80/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 27%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.95
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 51.5% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -103 / +103
|
|
STL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-105 |
-130 |
47.5% |
49.0% |
1.73 |
22.3 (2.0) |
— |
-4.4% |
4 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 4.60/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.41/60
- EV ice share
- 37%
- PP share
- 43%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.92
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 50.7% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +104 / -104
|
|
TBL vs STL 6:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+105 |
-135 |
45.9% |
47.9% |
2.72 |
19.8 (3.8) |
— |
-1.9% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.12/60
- PP shot rate
- 11.80/60
- EV ice share
- 29%
- PP share
- 74%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.97
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 50.2% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +109 / -109
|
|
STL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
+115 |
-150 |
43.7% |
46.7% |
1.73 |
16.9 (1.5) |
— |
+0.5% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.33/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.80/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 33%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.91
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 50.5% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +114 / -114
|
|
STL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
+120 |
-160 |
42.5% |
43.7% |
1.56 |
15.8 (2.0) |
— |
-4.0% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 5.72/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.18/60
- EV ice share
- 26%
- PP share
- 43%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.93
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 45.1% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +129 / -129
|
|
TBL vs STL 6:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+120 |
-160 |
42.5% |
43.0% |
2.44 |
18.5 (3.5) |
— |
-5.5% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.73/60
- PP shot rate
- 11.13/60
- EV ice share
- 29%
- PP share
- 68%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 43.5% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +133 / -133
|
|
STL @ TBL 6:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
+125 |
-165 |
41.7% |
42.7% |
1.49 |
15.4 (1.7) |
— |
-4.0% |
0 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 5.49/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.70/60
- EV ice share
- 26%
- PP share
- 37%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.92
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 43.9% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +134 / -134
|
|
TBL vs STL 6:00 PM CT |
3.5 |
+130 |
-175 |
40.6% |
40.2% |
3.18 |
20.2 (4.1) |
— |
-7.6% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 8.30/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.37/60
- EV ice share
- 31%
- PP share
- 80%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 39.7% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +149 / -149
|
|
TBL vs STL 6:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+125 |
-165 |
41.7% |
39.5% |
2.16 |
22.7 (3.5) |
— |
-11.1% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 5.15/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.82/60
- EV ice share
- 36%
- PP share
- 68%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.97
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.44 – 2.295 market
- Sim P(over)
- 37.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +153 / -153
|
|
PHI vs VAN 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
-195 |
+145 |
61.8% |
64.7% |
2.42 |
19.5 (2.9) |
— |
-2.2% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.97/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.54/60
- EV ice share
- 30%
- PP share
- 53%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.97
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 68.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -183 / +183
|
|
VAN @ PHI 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
-180 |
+135 |
60.2% |
61.3% |
2.21 |
19.3 (3.5) |
— |
-4.7% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.79/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.86/60
- EV ice share
- 30%
- PP share
- 67%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.88
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 62.6% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -158 / +158
|
|
VAN @ PHI 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
-195 |
+145 |
61.8% |
61.1% |
2.11 |
17.0 (3.2) |
— |
-7.6% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.81/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.85/60
- EV ice share
- 25%
- PP share
- 62%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.88
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 60.2% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -157 / +157
|
|
VAN @ PHI 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
-180 |
+135 |
60.2% |
60.9% |
2.17 |
19.1 (3.0) |
— |
-5.3% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.95/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.90/60
- EV ice share
- 28%
- PP share
- 58%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.87
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 61.8% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -156 / +156
|
|
VAN @ PHI 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
-190 |
+140 |
61.1% |
58.8% |
1.90 |
16.8 (1.9) |
— |
-10.2% |
3 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.97/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.75/60
- EV ice share
- 26%
- PP share
- 39%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.87
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 55.9% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -143 / +143
|
|
PHI vs VAN 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
-135 |
+100 |
53.5% |
51.6% |
1.69 |
16.5 (2.6) |
— |
-10.2% |
0 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.06/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.57/60
- EV ice share
- 24%
- PP share
- 47%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.95
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 49.3% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -107 / +107
|
|
PHI vs VAN 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
-115 |
-115 |
50.0% |
51.2% |
1.80 |
17.4 (1.7) |
— |
-4.3% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.14/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.13/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 33%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.95
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 52.6% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -105 / +105
|
|
PHI vs VAN 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
+115 |
-150 |
43.7% |
46.4% |
1.67 |
16.9 (0.5) |
— |
-0.2% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.04/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.21/60
- EV ice share
- 29%
- PP share
- 8%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.94
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 49.9% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +115 / -115
|
|
VAN @ PHI 6:30 PM CT |
1.5 |
+115 |
-150 |
43.7% |
45.8% |
1.69 |
18.3 (2.0) |
— |
-1.5% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 5.60/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.66/60
- EV ice share
- 30%
- PP share
- 40%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.88
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 48.5% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +118 / -118
|
|
PHI vs VAN 6:30 PM CT |
2.5 |
+130 |
-175 |
40.6% |
42.1% |
2.45 |
16.8 (2.7) |
— |
-3.1% |
10 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 8.10/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.04/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 49%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.96
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 44.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +137 / -137
|
|
PHI vs VAN 6:30 PM CT |
2.5 |
+135 |
-185 |
39.6% |
40.2% |
2.35 |
19.6 (3.0) |
— |
-5.6% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.51/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.51/60
- EV ice share
- 32%
- PP share
- 56%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.97
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 40.9% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +149 / -149
|
|
VAN @ PHI 6:30 PM CT |
2.5 |
+125 |
-170 |
41.4% |
39.9% |
2.22 |
16.3 (1.8) |
— |
-10.3% |
4 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 8.27/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.73/60
- EV ice share
- 29%
- PP share
- 36%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.88
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 38.1% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +151 / -151
|
|
PHI vs VAN 6:30 PM CT |
2.5 |
+145 |
-190 |
38.4% |
36.7% |
2.11 |
14.7 (2.2) |
— |
-10.2% |
4 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.72/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.05/60
- EV ice share
- 24%
- PP share
- 42%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 2.885 – 2.57 market
- Sim P(over)
- 34.6% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +173 / -173
|
|
SEA @ ANA 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-180 |
+135 |
60.2% |
60.2% |
2.08 |
19.7 (3.0) |
— |
-6.4% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 5.77/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.25/60
- EV ice share
- 30%
- PP share
- 57%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.99
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 60.2% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -151 / +151
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-175 |
+130 |
59.4% |
59.5% |
2.08 |
24.7 (3.2) |
— |
-6.5% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 4.82/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.31/60
- EV ice share
- 37%
- PP share
- 60%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.96
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 59.7% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -147 / +147
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-185 |
+135 |
60.4% |
58.5% |
1.96 |
15.3 (2.0) |
— |
-9.9% |
5 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.91/60
- PP shot rate
- 11.74/60
- EV ice share
- 26%
- PP share
- 38%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 56.2% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -141 / +141
|
|
SEA @ ANA 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-185 |
+135 |
60.4% |
58.1% |
1.89 |
16.9 (2.2) |
— |
-10.6% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.13/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.14/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 45%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 55.1% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -138 / +138
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-150 |
+110 |
55.8% |
56.3% |
1.97 |
15.5 (2.0) |
— |
-6.2% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.86/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.36/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 38%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 56.9% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -129 / +129
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-145 |
+110 |
55.4% |
55.7% |
1.93 |
16.9 (3.1) |
— |
-5.9% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.23/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.78/60
- EV ice share
- 24%
- PP share
- 57%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.97
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 56.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -126 / +126
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-140 |
+105 |
54.5% |
54.5% |
1.84 |
12.9 (0.8) |
— |
-6.6% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 8.42/60
- PP shot rate
- 13.45/60
- EV ice share
- 22%
- PP share
- 16%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.97
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 54.5% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -120 / +120
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-115 |
-115 |
50.0% |
48.2% |
1.58 |
21.9 (0.7) |
— |
-9.9% |
3 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 4.82/60
- PP shot rate
- 8.36/60
- EV ice share
- 38%
- PP share
- 13%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.95
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 46.1% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +107 / -107
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+110 |
-150 |
44.3% |
44.8% |
2.51 |
18.4 (3.1) |
— |
-6.0% |
5 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.08/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.49/60
- EV ice share
- 28%
- PP share
- 57%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 45.4% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +123 / -123
|
|
SEA @ ANA 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+130 |
-175 |
40.6% |
41.2% |
2.40 |
18.7 (3.1) |
— |
-5.2% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.73/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.10/60
- EV ice share
- 30%
- PP share
- 59%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.99
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 42.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +143 / -143
|
|
SEA @ ANA 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+140 |
-185 |
39.1% |
40.0% |
2.33 |
22.6 (3.1) |
— |
-4.0% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 5.47/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.63/60
- EV ice share
- 38%
- PP share
- 61%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.99
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 41.1% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +150 / -150
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+145 |
-195 |
38.2% |
39.0% |
2.31 |
17.7 (3.2) |
— |
-4.4% |
0 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.52/60
- PP shot rate
- 11.05/60
- EV ice share
- 26%
- PP share
- 59%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 40.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +156 / -156
|
|
ANA vs SEA 9:00 PM CT |
3.5 |
+125 |
-170 |
41.4% |
36.2% |
2.76 |
16.3 (2.3) |
— |
-18.6% |
8 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 9.09/60
- PP shot rate
- 15.07/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 44%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.98
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.601 – 2.837 market
- Sim P(over)
- 30.3% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +176 / -176
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-195 |
+145 |
61.8% |
62.2% |
2.23 |
19.1 (2.0) |
— |
-5.9% |
3 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.62/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.15/60
- EV ice share
- 30%
- PP share
- 43%
- Matchup × rink
- ×1.00
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 62.7% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -165 / +165
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-155 |
+120 |
57.2% |
58.4% |
2.07 |
15.1 (0.4) |
— |
-4.0% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.87/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.55/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 6%
- Matchup × rink
- ×1.00
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 59.8% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -140 / +140
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-165 |
+125 |
58.4% |
57.8% |
2.01 |
15.5 (0.9) |
— |
-7.1% |
0 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.36/60
- PP shot rate
- 11.60/60
- EV ice share
- 26%
- PP share
- 19%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.99
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 57.2% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -137 / +137
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
-155 |
+115 |
56.7% |
56.2% |
2.97 |
18.7 (2.9) |
— |
-7.5% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 8.14/60
- PP shot rate
- 13.50/60
- EV ice share
- 29%
- PP share
- 60%
- Matchup × rink
- ×1.01
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 55.6% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -128 / +128
|
|
CBJ @ LAK 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-140 |
+105 |
54.5% |
55.9% |
1.98 |
17.7 (1.4) |
— |
-4.1% |
4 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.91/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.80/60
- EV ice share
- 32%
- PP share
- 35%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.91
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 57.7% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -127 / +127
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
-145 |
+110 |
55.4% |
55.6% |
3.00 |
18.5 (3.1) |
— |
-6.1% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 8.14/60
- PP shot rate
- 13.04/60
- EV ice share
- 29%
- PP share
- 64%
- Matchup × rink
- ×1.01
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 55.7% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -125 / +125
|
|
CBJ @ LAK 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-110 |
-120 |
49.0% |
52.8% |
1.99 |
16.6 (2.5) |
— |
+0.8% |
3 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.80/60
- PP shot rate
- 11.04/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 59%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.92
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 57.4% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- -112 / +112
|
|
CBJ @ LAK 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
+115 |
-150 |
43.7% |
48.9% |
1.90 |
17.5 (2.3) |
OVER best |
+5.0% |
L 1 SOG · -1.00u |
- EV shot rate
- 6.45/60
- PP shot rate
- 9.72/60
- EV ice share
- 26%
- PP share
- 55%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.90
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 55.2% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +105 / -105
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
-105 |
-125 |
48.0% |
48.7% |
1.71 |
13.3 (2.1) |
— |
-5.0% |
1 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 6.23/60
- PP shot rate
- 10.55/60
- EV ice share
- 22%
- PP share
- 44%
- Matchup × rink
- ×1.03
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 49.5% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +106 / -106
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
+100 |
-135 |
46.5% |
48.5% |
1.74 |
19.1 (3.0) |
— |
-2.9% |
0 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 4.88/60
- PP shot rate
- 7.07/60
- EV ice share
- 29%
- PP share
- 62%
- Matchup × rink
- ×1.00
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 51.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +106 / -106
|
|
CBJ @ LAK 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
-115 |
-115 |
50.0% |
47.6% |
2.50 |
19.7 (2.4) |
— |
-11.0% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.21/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.29/60
- EV ice share
- 32%
- PP share
- 57%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.92
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 44.7% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +110 / -110
|
|
CBJ @ LAK 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
+100 |
-130 |
46.9% |
46.3% |
1.55 |
25.4 (1.2) |
— |
-7.5% |
3 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 4.21/60
- PP shot rate
- 7.16/60
- EV ice share
- 41%
- PP share
- 31%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.89
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 45.4% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +116 / -116
|
|
CBJ @ LAK 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+100 |
-130 |
46.9% |
46.1% |
2.50 |
18.4 (2.6) |
— |
-7.8% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.56/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.35/60
- EV ice share
- 30%
- PP share
- 63%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.92
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 45.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +117 / -117
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
1.5 |
+100 |
-135 |
46.5% |
45.9% |
1.57 |
23.1 (2.4) |
— |
-8.3% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 3.64/60
- PP shot rate
- 6.77/60
- EV ice share
- 38%
- PP share
- 49%
- Matchup × rink
- ×1.00
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 45.0% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +118 / -118
|
|
LAK vs CBJ 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+125 |
-165 |
41.7% |
40.8% |
2.29 |
17.0 (1.5) |
— |
-8.3% |
2 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.64/60
- PP shot rate
- 11.67/60
- EV ice share
- 28%
- PP share
- 31%
- Matchup × rink
- ×1.00
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 39.7% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +145 / -145
|
|
CBJ @ LAK 9:00 PM CT |
2.5 |
+145 |
-190 |
38.4% |
37.7% |
2.18 |
16.9 (1.3) |
— |
-7.7% |
4 SOG |
- EV shot rate
- 7.71/60
- PP shot rate
- 12.28/60
- EV ice share
- 27%
- PP share
- 32%
- Matchup × rink
- ×0.90
- Team goals (sim)
- 3.232 – 2.661 market
- Sim P(over)
- 36.8% simulation only
- Fair over / under
- +165 / -165
|