← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
6
Lines priced
86
Best bets
0
Leans
5
Updated
Oct 19, 6:02 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
BUF vs MTL 11:30 AM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 61.8% 2.26 15.0 (2.7) — -3.9% 1 SOG
MTL @ BUF 11:30 AM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 61.0% 2.16 20.4 (3.0) — -5.2% 4 SOG
MTL @ BUF 11:30 AM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 59.8% 3.18 18.7 (3.0) — -6.0% 2 SOG
MTL @ BUF 11:30 AM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 58.5% 1.99 24.5 (2.8) — -7.1% 1 SOG
BUF vs MTL 11:30 AM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 57.4% 2.84 18.3 (3.0) — -9.8% 3 SOG
MTL @ BUF 11:30 AM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 56.7% 1.98 14.0 (1.6) — -6.7% 1 SOG
BUF vs MTL 11:30 AM CT 2.5 -160 +120 57.5% 56.1% 2.81 24.7 (3.5) — -8.8% 3 SOG
BUF vs MTL 11:30 AM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 55.7% 1.93 15.5 (2.0) — -5.9% 1 SOG
MTL @ BUF 11:30 AM CT 1.5 -135 +105 54.1% 54.4% 1.86 17.2 (2.8) — -5.3% 1 SOG
MTL @ BUF 11:30 AM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 54.2% 2.03 17.8 (2.9) — -2.4% 1 SOG
BUF vs MTL 11:30 AM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 51.0% 2.70 18.7 (2.2) — -6.5% 1 SOG
BUF vs MTL 11:30 AM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 49.0% 2.66 17.8 (3.0) — -6.5% 2 SOG
BUF vs MTL 11:30 AM CT 3.5 -125 -110 51.5% 48.7% 3.37 18.3 (3.1) — -12.3% 1 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 62.3% 2.20 16.8 (3.1) — -5.8% 2 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 59.1% 1.92 24.9 (0.6) — -8.9% 4 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 56.1% 1.98 16.0 (0.7) — -6.5% 4 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 56.1% 1.72 13.3 (2.1) — -10.9% 1 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +100 53.5% 54.4% 1.92 15.2 (2.1) — -5.3% 2 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -130 -105 52.5% 51.7% 3.71 18.6 (2.9) — -8.5% 6 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -115 -115 50.0% 50.9% 2.79 19.3 (1.7) — -4.8% 0 SOG
SJS @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.2% 1.65 19.4 (2.6) — -8.0% 1 SOG
SJS @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 46.3% 2.48 16.7 (2.6) — -7.4% 4 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +130 -175 40.6% 41.2% 3.36 21.3 (3.0) — -5.3% 5 SOG
SJS @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 39.9% 2.14 17.9 (2.4) — -10.2% 5 SOG
PHI vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 39.3% 2.13 15.2 (2.2) — -9.7% 2 SOG
SJS @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 38.5% 2.13 17.7 (2.1) — -9.4% 1 SOG
SJS @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 37.0% 2.09 20.6 (2.9) — -9.3% 5 SOG
PIT vs DAL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 61.1% 2.04 23.2 (2.3) — -7.5% 0 SOG
PIT vs DAL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 57.9% 1.95 14.7 (1.9) — -7.0% 0 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 57.6% 1.84 16.1 (2.0) — -9.5% 1 SOG
PIT vs DAL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 56.4% 1.83 16.7 (0.1) — -8.4% 0 SOG
PIT vs DAL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +115 56.7% 55.3% 2.78 19.1 (2.9) — -9.0% 0 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 55.3% 1.86 15.3 (1.7) — -7.9% 2 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 54.9% 1.83 14.9 (1.9) — -7.2% 2 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 54.1% 1.73 21.5 (1.7) — -8.7% 1 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 52.0% 2.69 18.7 (2.3) — -8.0% 8 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 51.3% 2.55 18.2 (2.5) — -10.7% 1 SOG
PIT vs DAL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -125 -105 52.0% 50.6% 2.56 18.8 (2.5) — -9.0% 0 SOG
PIT vs DAL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 47.4% 2.29 22.4 (2.9) — -13.0% 0 SOG
PIT vs DAL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 45.4% 2.49 20.2 (3.2) — -6.9% 2 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -150 44.3% 43.5% 2.34 16.2 (1.8) — -8.7% 2 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 41.8% 2.24 24.6 (2.7) — -10.0% 7 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 40.4% 2.21 16.0 (1.7) — -9.2% 2 SOG
PIT vs DAL 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +130 -170 40.9% 39.7% 3.05 20.5 (3.2) — -8.8% 2 SOG
DAL @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 38.4% 2.04 16.5 (2.2) — -11.6% 3 SOG
LAK @ CGY 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 59.9% 2.02 14.4 (0.7) — -6.8% 1 SOG
LAK @ CGY 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 59.2% 1.86 16.3 (1.7) — -9.7% 1 SOG
CGY vs LAK 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 56.7% 1.83 24.6 (2.2) — -8.9% 0 SOG
LAK @ CGY 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 55.1% 1.79 17.0 (1.7) — -8.2% 0 SOG
CGY vs LAK 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -135 +100 53.5% 54.3% 1.90 17.9 (3.2) — -5.6% 2 SOG
CGY vs LAK 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 54.0% 1.68 14.3 (1.6) — -10.0% 1 SOG
LAK @ CGY 7:30 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 52.1% 2.55 17.3 (2.9) — -10.7% 3 SOG
LAK @ CGY 7:30 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 46.1% 2.36 16.4 (1.6) — -9.9% 2 SOG
CGY vs LAK 7:30 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 45.4% 2.34 24.3 (3.2) — -9.1% 1 SOG
CGY vs LAK 7:30 PM CT 2.5 +105 -135 45.9% 44.2% 2.30 19.0 (3.1) — -9.4% 4 SOG
CGY vs LAK 7:30 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 43.3% 2.31 19.1 (2.1) — -9.1% 3 SOG
CGY vs LAK 7:30 PM CT 3.5 +125 -165 41.7% 40.3% 3.08 18.8 (3.2) — -9.4% 2 SOG
CGY vs LAK 7:30 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 39.9% 2.14 16.7 (1.2) — -10.3% 1 SOG
LAK @ CGY 7:30 PM CT 2.5 +120 -165 42.2% 39.3% 2.01 15.3 (2.4) — -13.6% 2 SOG
LAK @ CGY 7:30 PM CT 3.5 +135 -180 39.8% 37.6% 2.87 18.9 (2.8) — -11.7% 3 SOG
COL vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 60.2% 2.12 19.0 (3.9) — -5.4% 3 SOG
NSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 58.9% 1.97 21.1 (1.4) — -7.4% 2 SOG
NSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 58.9% 2.96 24.1 (3.6) — -8.4% 3 SOG
NSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 57.8% 1.99 19.5 (3.2) — -6.1% 2 SOG
COL vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 56.8% 1.86 23.1 (1.5) — -7.7% 1 SOG
NSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -145 +110 55.4% 52.9% 2.62 18.3 (3.8) — -10.7% 3 SOG
COL vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -125 -105 52.0% 52.6% 2.83 22.5 (3.8) — -5.3% 1 SOG
NSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 3.5 -150 +115 56.3% 52.5% 3.39 18.5 (3.5) UNDER lean +2.1% W 3 SOG · +1.15u
NSH @ COL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.9% 2.76 17.5 (3.3) — -6.7% 6 SOG
COL vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 4.5 +110 -145 44.6% 46.0% 4.64 23.8 (4.4) — -3.3% 5 SOG
COL vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 44.3% 3.38 23.7 (4.5) — -6.9% 4 SOG
COL vs NSH 8:00 PM CT 3.5 +120 -155 42.8% 38.0% 2.67 23.6 (4.2) UNDER lean +2.0% W 2 SOG · +0.65u
VGK vs CAR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 57.9% 1.96 22.0 (3.1) — -7.0% 3 SOG
VGK vs CAR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 57.5% 1.87 16.7 (2.0) — -8.7% 6 SOG
CAR @ VGK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 55.1% 2.50 17.3 (2.5) UNDER lean +3.2% L 3 SOG · -1.00u
VGK vs CAR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 54.9% 1.80 22.7 (1.6) — -7.3% 0 SOG
CAR @ VGK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -170 +125 58.6% 53.9% 2.43 18.9 (2.5) UNDER lean +3.6% W 0 SOG · +1.25u
CAR @ VGK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 53.8% 1.68 15.4 (0.3) — -9.1% 2 SOG
VGK vs CAR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.7% 1.74 22.7 (1.9) — -7.9% 3 SOG
VGK vs CAR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.7% 1.76 17.4 (3.4) — -8.0% 2 SOG
CAR @ VGK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -160 +120 57.5% 53.5% 2.45 16.9 (2.4) UNDER lean +2.3% L 3 SOG · -1.00u
CAR @ VGK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 51.7% 1.51 18.2 (2.6) — -12.7% 1 SOG
VGK vs CAR 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +120 -165 42.2% 41.1% 3.16 20.6 (3.6) — -9.6% 4 SOG
CAR @ VGK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -150 44.3% 40.7% 2.02 21.7 (1.3) — -14.5% 1 SOG
VGK vs CAR 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -150 44.3% 40.5% 1.99 15.3 (2.2) — -14.9% 4 SOG
CAR @ VGK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -190 38.9% 34.4% 1.74 14.3 (1.0) — -17.5% 2 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.