← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
8
Lines priced
113
Best bets
0
Leans
2
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
NJD vs BUF 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +140 60.9% 61.7% 2.20 15.8 (1.2) — -4.9% 1 SOG
BUF @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 60.4% 2.00 16.0 (2.1) — -8.7% 3 SOG
BUF @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +120 57.8% 59.5% 2.15 16.7 (3.0) — -4.4% 3 SOG
BUF @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 56.1% 1.93 16.0 (2.8) — -7.8% 3 SOG
NJD vs BUF 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -145 +110 55.4% 53.4% 2.75 21.1 (3.4) — -9.8% 2 SOG
NJD vs BUF 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 51.8% 1.75 17.9 (2.3) — -6.7% 1 SOG
NJD vs BUF 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.3% 1.71 16.8 (1.3) — -7.8% 2 SOG
BUF @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 47.7% 2.50 24.9 (3.1) — -9.0% 1 SOG
BUF @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -135 45.9% 46.5% 1.62 23.8 (0.7) — -4.6% 0 SOG
NJD vs BUF 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -115 -120 49.5% 46.2% 3.31 19.1 (2.8) — -13.6% 1 SOG
BUF @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.4% 3.31 20.1 (3.1) — -11.5% 3 SOG
BUF @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -140 45.5% 45.0% 1.54 15.8 (2.4) — -7.9% 1 SOG
NJD vs BUF 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -185 39.6% 42.4% 2.57 19.0 (3.3) — -0.4% 2 SOG
NJD vs BUF 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +115 -155 43.4% 42.1% 3.27 19.1 (2.4) — -9.4% 6 SOG
BUF @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 40.5% 2.28 19.6 (1.2) — -9.0% 2 SOG
NJD vs BUF 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +135 -180 39.8% 36.7% 2.81 22.2 (2.8) — -13.8% 3 SOG
PHI @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +145 62.0% 62.6% 2.24 18.8 (3.0) — -6.2% 1 SOG
WSH vs PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 61.0% 2.05 18.8 (0.5) — -7.8% 1 SOG
PHI @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 60.0% 2.12 14.3 (2.0) — -7.6% 2 SOG
PHI @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 58.5% 2.03 19.4 (2.6) — -6.1% 2 SOG
WSH vs PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 58.1% 1.96 16.0 (0.7) — -7.8% 4 SOG
WSH vs PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 57.5% 1.95 15.3 (3.1) — -7.6% 3 SOG
WSH vs PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 57.0% 2.87 25.3 (3.3) — -10.4% 1 SOG
WSH vs PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 56.5% 1.97 17.9 (3.3) — -5.9% 1 SOG
WSH vs PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 -105 52.5% 50.4% 2.62 16.3 (4.6) — -10.8% 3 SOG
WSH vs PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 50.0% 1.62 15.7 (1.9) — -10.0% 1 SOG
PHI @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.4% 2.39 15.4 (2.1) — -11.4% 2 SOG
PHI @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 44.1% 2.53 19.7 (3.0) — -5.2% 1 SOG
TOR @ TBL 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 62.4% 2.27 17.4 (2.6) — -4.7% 3 SOG
TOR @ TBL 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -200 +145 62.0% 61.3% 2.06 15.9 (0.9) — -8.1% 3 SOG
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 61.0% 3.26 21.1 (3.3) — -5.2% 4 SOG
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 55.9% 1.92 14.5 (3.3) — -6.8% 4 SOG
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -155 +120 57.2% 53.6% 2.69 24.8 (3.8) UNDER lean +2.0% L 3 SOG · -1.00u
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 53.3% 1.73 16.0 (0.4) — -9.9% 0 SOG
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -130 -105 52.5% 52.7% 2.83 19.8 (4.0) — -6.8% 5 SOG
TOR @ TBL 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 51.2% 1.84 17.3 (2.7) — -4.3% 3 SOG
TOR @ TBL 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 48.6% 1.67 16.1 (1.4) — -7.2% 2 SOG
TOR @ TBL 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 47.8% 1.64 19.8 (2.5) — -6.8% 3 SOG
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 47.7% 1.65 17.0 (0.5) — -6.9% 3 SOG
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 47.4% 1.54 16.9 (1.8) — -9.4% 1 SOG
TOR @ TBL 6:30 PM CT 3.5 +105 -135 45.9% 46.4% 3.60 20.9 (2.8) — -4.8% 2 SOG
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 3.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.4% 3.31 20.4 (4.1) — -11.3% 2 SOG
TOR @ TBL 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 39.1% 2.22 16.5 (2.4) — -8.1% 4 SOG
TBL vs TOR 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 38.9% 2.14 15.3 (3.1) — -12.5% 5 SOG
DAL vs SEA 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 58.5% 1.87 23.1 (1.7) — -10.7% 2 SOG
DAL vs SEA 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +140 60.9% 56.8% 1.74 16.4 (1.7) UNDER lean +3.7% W 1 SOG · +1.40u
SEA @ DAL 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 55.7% 1.94 17.3 (2.7) — -5.9% 3 SOG
SEA @ DAL 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 54.3% 1.86 20.8 (2.8) — -6.9% 1 SOG
SEA @ DAL 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +100 53.5% 53.9% 1.85 18.6 (2.8) — -6.2% 2 SOG
SEA @ DAL 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.1% 1.73 16.3 (1.7) — -9.0% 0 SOG
DAL vs SEA 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 -105 52.5% 51.2% 1.71 15.1 (1.3) — -9.5% 5 SOG
DAL vs SEA 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 50.6% 2.60 19.3 (3.6) — -10.5% 4 SOG
DAL vs SEA 7:00 PM CT 3.5 -115 -115 50.0% 46.3% 3.28 19.5 (4.0) — -13.5% 3 SOG
SEA @ DAL 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 42.0% 2.30 22.7 (1.9) — -9.7% 2 SOG
SEA @ DAL 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 42.0% 2.23 17.5 (2.7) — -11.8% 1 SOG
DAL vs SEA 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -190 38.4% 38.1% 2.20 25.3 (3.6) — -6.8% 2 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 62.5% 2.27 18.3 (2.5) — -4.6% 1 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 57.8% 1.97 13.4 (1.1) — -8.3% 2 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +105 54.1% 56.9% 2.12 17.0 (2.5) — -1.0% 1 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +115 56.7% 56.6% 3.01 17.4 (3.2) — -6.9% 3 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 56.5% 2.18 17.1 (2.5) — +0.0% 0 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 55.2% 1.99 15.9 (2.4) — -2.3% 5 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 54.1% 1.96 24.2 (3.2) — -2.6% 5 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +105 54.1% 52.5% 2.73 25.2 (3.8) — -8.6% 2 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +100 53.5% 52.2% 1.75 18.5 (0.4) — -9.2% 0 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 51.8% 1.87 19.7 (1.0) — -3.2% 1 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 51.5% 1.88 17.5 (1.3) — -1.8% 3 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 47.9% 2.80 21.9 (3.5) — -1.7% 3 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 46.8% 2.76 18.5 (3.3) — -1.8% 5 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 1.5 +115 -150 43.7% 45.1% 1.62 21.7 (1.4) — -3.1% 2 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -140 45.5% 44.8% 1.54 20.4 (1.6) — -8.2% 1 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 42.8% 2.50 19.2 (2.6) — -3.7% 1 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 42.4% 2.56 20.0 (3.6) — -0.3% 5 SOG
UTA vs COL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 42.2% 2.51 19.9 (3.2) — -2.9% 1 SOG
COL @ UTA 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -195 39.2% 37.8% 2.12 16.2 (2.3) — -11.3% 1 SOG
WPG @ VAN 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +150 62.5% 63.5% 2.30 21.9 (2.9) — -4.8% 3 SOG
VAN vs WPG 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 58.4% 2.04 17.8 (2.2) — -7.3% 1 SOG
WPG @ VAN 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 58.3% 2.04 17.8 (2.8) — -5.3% 2 SOG
VAN vs WPG 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 -105 52.5% 53.3% 1.86 17.8 (3.0) — -5.8% 0 SOG
WPG @ VAN 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +120 -160 42.5% 42.9% 3.42 22.1 (2.9) — -5.5% 4 SOG
VAN vs WPG 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 41.5% 2.19 16.5 (2.8) — -12.9% 1 SOG
VAN vs WPG 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 40.4% 2.24 18.5 (3.2) — -9.2% 2 SOG
VAN vs WPG 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 40.3% 2.33 16.1 (1.8) — -5.4% 4 SOG
WPG @ VAN 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -185 39.6% 35.9% 1.91 14.9 (2.1) — -15.7% 4 SOG
LAK vs VGK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 61.5% 2.13 17.1 (1.4) — -6.9% 3 SOG
LAK vs VGK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 57.9% 1.96 21.3 (2.7) — -8.0% 1 SOG
LAK vs VGK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 57.0% 1.93 18.9 (1.8) — -7.3% 4 SOG
LAK vs VGK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +120 57.2% 54.8% 2.80 21.0 (3.5) — -9.9% 3 SOG
VGK @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -145 +110 55.4% 52.7% 2.70 17.8 (3.3) — -10.9% 4 SOG
LAK vs VGK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 50.4% 1.77 15.9 (0.6) — -5.7% 0 SOG
VGK @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 50.0% 1.56 16.3 (0.9) — -11.6% 2 SOG
LAK vs VGK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 -105 52.5% 49.5% 2.51 18.3 (2.8) — -12.5% 4 SOG
LAK vs VGK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 49.3% 1.67 15.8 (2.7) — -7.8% 0 SOG
VGK @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 44.5% 2.31 17.4 (3.4) — -13.2% 2 SOG
VGK @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -185 39.1% 36.2% 1.98 23.2 (1.8) — -13.2% 1 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 61.1% 2.23 17.7 (2.4) — -4.0% 0 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -200 +145 62.0% 61.0% 2.10 15.6 (2.1) — -8.5% 1 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 60.7% 2.13 19.7 (4.0) — -5.7% 2 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -185 +140 60.9% 59.4% 1.96 21.4 (0.5) — -8.5% 0 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 58.1% 1.99 20.9 (1.1) — -7.7% 0 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 57.7% 2.02 16.6 (3.2) — -6.2% 1 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 2.5 -165 +125 58.4% 57.7% 3.06 20.1 (4.0) — -7.4% 3 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 2.5 -155 +120 57.2% 55.3% 2.84 25.1 (4.1) — -9.0% 3 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 54.4% 1.97 17.5 (1.3) — -2.0% 4 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 54.4% 1.79 22.9 (1.0) — -8.1% 4 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 53.6% 1.76 14.6 (0.9) — -9.4% 2 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 51.1% 1.91 24.6 (3.3) — -0.3% 1 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.6% 1.70 20.9 (0.6) — -7.3% 0 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 3.5 -105 -130 47.5% 47.9% 3.63 23.4 (4.1) — -6.4% 2 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 45.4% 2.60 18.7 (3.2) — -4.8% 2 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 3.5 +110 -165 43.3% 40.6% 3.09 17.0 (3.0) — -14.7% 3 SOG
ANA vs EDM 9:30 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 39.9% 2.29 19.2 (2.9) — -6.1% 4 SOG
EDM @ ANA 9:30 PM CT 3.5 +130 -170 40.9% 38.6% 2.98 22.1 (4.1) — -11.2% 3 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.