← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
6
Lines priced
89
Best bets
1
Leans
4
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Best Bets

Ryan Strome
ANA vs NYR · 9:00 PM CT · F
OVER 1.5
Price+105
Model52.3%
Book45.5%
EV+7.3%
Fair-110
Stake1.7%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 1.96 SOG · 16.9 min (2.2 PP) L 0 SOG · -1.00u

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 63.3% 2.29 20.3 (3.5) — -4.3% 1 SOG
UTA @ FLA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +140 60.9% 62.1% 2.21 19.1 (3.4) — -4.3% 1 SOG
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 60.9% 2.16 25.3 (3.2) — -3.3% 3 SOG
UTA @ FLA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 60.2% 2.25 19.4 (2.5) — +0.4% 3 SOG
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 60.0% 2.11 23.8 (0.5) — -5.7% 1 SOG
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 56.2% 1.93 15.2 (1.3) — -6.4% 3 SOG
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 53.2% 2.85 17.5 (2.9) — -7.5% 6 SOG
UTA @ FLA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +115 56.3% 51.3% 2.58 16.8 (3.4) UNDER lean +4.7% W 1 SOG · +1.15u
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -125 -105 52.0% 50.4% 2.70 20.7 (3.5) — -9.4% 3 SOG
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -115 -115 50.0% 50.3% 2.75 17.6 (2.0) — -6.0% 3 SOG
UTA @ FLA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 49.8% 1.79 16.0 (2.5) — -2.8% 2 SOG
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 48.1% 1.64 15.4 (1.4) — -8.3% 1 SOG
UTA @ FLA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +110 -145 44.6% 47.6% 1.71 24.2 (3.4) — 0.0% 2 SOG
UTA @ FLA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 46.9% 2.65 19.5 (3.6) — -3.8% 1 SOG
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -165 42.2% 40.7% 2.26 16.6 (3.0) — -10.6% 4 SOG
FLA vs UTA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 37.2% 2.08 16.6 (2.7) — -14.5% 0 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 61.7% 2.14 16.3 (2.6) — -6.7% 0 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 61.3% 2.16 14.6 (1.9) — -4.6% 1 SOG
MTL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 58.8% 2.06 20.2 (3.7) — -4.4% 1 SOG
MTL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 55.2% 1.90 18.1 (3.1) — -5.3% 1 SOG
MTL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 51.3% 2.77 18.5 (3.1) — -6.0% 0 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.3% 1.70 18.4 (1.1) — -7.8% 1 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 50.2% 1.66 18.9 (3.2) — -9.7% 4 SOG
MTL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 50.2% 1.77 24.5 (1.5) — -2.1% 0 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 49.7% 1.67 13.8 (1.7) — -9.0% 0 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.8% 2.48 18.6 (3.3) — -10.6% 2 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 45.6% 2.51 19.6 (3.5) — -8.8% 4 SOG
MTL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +120 -160 42.5% 45.6% 1.66 13.9 (1.3) — +0.2% 2 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -140 45.5% 43.4% 1.45 20.5 (0.4) — -11.0% 1 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 41.6% 2.39 16.3 (2.9) — -6.5% 2 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 36.5% 2.08 15.7 (2.6) — -14.3% 3 SOG
CAR vs MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 34.9% 2.02 20.3 (2.2) — -14.5% 1 SOG
MTL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 32.4% 1.84 14.6 (3.1) UNDER lean +2.2% W 1 SOG · +0.51u
CBJ vs VAN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 63.7% 2.28 18.2 (1.9) — -3.6% 6 SOG
CBJ vs VAN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 61.3% 2.24 17.8 (2.2) — -3.6% 2 SOG
CBJ vs VAN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 60.8% 2.20 19.0 (2.4) — -1.3% 1 SOG
CBJ vs VAN 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 58.7% 3.25 28.2 (2.7) — +0.6% 6 SOG
VAN @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 55.5% 1.87 18.1 (1.5) — -8.7% 1 SOG
CBJ vs VAN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 55.5% 2.04 16.5 (2.3) — +1.8% 3 SOG
VAN @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 52.6% 1.77 14.9 (0.9) — -7.0% 6 SOG
VAN @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 51.7% 2.82 26.5 (3.5) — -5.3% 5 SOG
CBJ vs VAN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 51.0% 1.82 17.1 (2.5) — -0.5% 1 SOG
CBJ vs VAN 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -150 43.7% 43.7% 2.46 18.7 (2.5) — -6.0% 2 SOG
VAN @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 41.4% 2.41 17.3 (2.4) — -2.6% 4 SOG
VAN @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 38.8% 2.28 18.9 (2.8) — -4.9% 3 SOG
VAN @ CBJ 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -185 39.6% 38.7% 2.23 17.3 (2.4) — -9.1% 4 SOG
NJD @ WPG 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 63.9% 2.35 19.3 (2.7) — -3.4% 0 SOG
WPG vs NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 59.6% 2.11 21.0 (3.2) — -5.3% 1 SOG
WPG vs NJD 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -170 +130 59.2% 58.5% 3.14 21.3 (3.2) — -7.1% 0 SOG
NJD @ WPG 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -170 +130 59.2% 56.8% 2.92 19.0 (2.4) — -9.8% 4 SOG
NJD @ WPG 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 53.4% 1.86 16.1 (1.5) — -3.9% 4 SOG
WPG vs NJD 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 50.5% 2.62 16.3 (2.9) — -12.2% 2 SOG
WPG vs NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 49.9% 1.65 14.2 (1.4) — -10.2% 2 SOG
NJD @ WPG 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 49.3% 1.59 16.8 (2.1) — -11.3% 5 SOG
NJD @ WPG 7:00 PM CT 1.5 +100 -135 46.5% 45.1% 1.52 15.2 (0.3) — -9.7% 0 SOG
NJD @ WPG 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 42.6% 2.42 20.9 (2.7) — -6.3% 2 SOG
WPG vs NJD 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 41.3% 2.38 25.3 (3.2) — -4.9% 2 SOG
VGK @ CHI 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 62.9% 2.22 18.2 (2.5) — -4.8% 3 SOG
VGK @ CHI 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 62.4% 2.21 21.9 (2.9) — -5.7% 2 SOG
VGK @ CHI 7:30 PM CT 2.5 -165 +125 58.4% 57.7% 3.06 19.1 (2.8) — -7.3% 0 SOG
VGK @ CHI 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 56.0% 1.97 22.5 (2.3) — -3.9% 1 SOG
VGK @ CHI 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 54.9% 1.90 14.9 (0.5) — -8.4% 1 SOG
CHI vs VGK 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 53.9% 1.90 16.6 (0.7) — -1.2% 4 SOG
VGK @ CHI 7:30 PM CT 2.5 -155 +115 56.7% 53.6% 2.80 16.1 (2.4) — -11.8% 1 SOG
CHI vs VGK 7:30 PM CT 1.5 +110 -150 44.3% 48.3% 1.79 15.4 (2.1) — +1.4% 1 SOG
CHI vs VGK 7:30 PM CT 1.5 +110 -145 44.6% 48.2% 1.76 16.4 (1.1) — +1.3% 2 SOG
VGK @ CHI 7:30 PM CT 1.5 -110 -125 48.5% 48.0% 1.63 15.5 (1.2) — -8.3% 3 SOG
CHI vs VGK 7:30 PM CT 1.5 +100 -130 46.9% 46.6% 1.60 21.2 (1.8) — -6.8% 0 SOG
CHI vs VGK 7:30 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 45.2% 2.59 18.7 (2.1) — -0.5% 4 SOG
CHI vs VGK 7:30 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 43.9% 2.54 19.8 (2.3) — -1.1% 0 SOG
VGK @ CHI 7:30 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 40.5% 2.25 16.7 (1.5) — -8.8% 0 SOG
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +120 57.2% 62.0% 2.29 17.8 (2.6) OVER lean +2.0% L 0 SOG · -1.00u
NYR @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 61.4% 2.26 19.0 (2.8) — -1.3% 1 SOG
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 61.2% 2.17 14.0 (1.3) — -4.8% 5 SOG
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 57.2% 1.95 20.4 (2.1) — -7.1% 5 SOG
NYR @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 56.4% 1.94 23.3 (3.0) — -3.4% 3 SOG
NYR @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 56.3% 1.96 15.9 (1.0) — -4.8% 1 SOG
NYR @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 55.9% 2.05 16.4 (1.5) — +0.6% 2 SOG
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +105 54.1% 55.8% 1.98 16.9 (1.9) — -2.9% 4 SOG
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -140 45.5% 52.3% 1.96 16.9 (2.2) OVER best +7.3% L 0 SOG · -1.00u
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 51.0% 1.81 15.7 (2.4) — -0.4% 3 SOG
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -150 43.7% 47.8% 2.76 16.4 (2.1) OVER lean +2.7% L 2 SOG · -1.00u
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -140 45.5% 47.6% 1.70 22.1 (2.5) — -2.4% 0 SOG
NYR @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -150 44.3% 45.1% 2.57 21.2 (2.4) — -5.3% 4 SOG
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 44.3% 2.55 18.6 (2.8) — -2.5% 6 SOG
ANA vs NYR 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 43.0% 2.34 17.7 (2.7) — -9.8% 3 SOG
NYR @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -165 42.2% 41.5% 2.34 19.4 (3.0) — -8.6% 2 SOG
NYR @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 40.2% 2.32 17.4 (2.8) — -5.5% 3 SOG
NYR @ ANA 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +130 -175 40.6% 37.8% 3.04 20.0 (3.1) — -13.1% 2 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.