← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
3
Lines priced
45
Best bets
2
Leans
3
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Best Bets

Sandis Vilmanis
FLA @ BUF · 12:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 1.5
Price-105
Model60.7%
Book48.0%
EV+18.4%
Fair-154
Stake4.8%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 0.97 SOG · 12.3 min (0.2 PP) W 0 SOG · +0.95u
Kirill Kaprizov
MIN vs VGK · 7:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 3.5
Price-145
Model63.0%
Book55.4%
EV+6.4%
Fair-170
Stake2.3%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 2.71 SOG · 22.6 min (3.6 PP) L 4 SOG · -1.00u

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -165 +125 58.4% 55.9% 2.86 16.9 (2.8) — -10.3% 3 SOG
BUF vs FLA 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 55.3% 1.92 17.8 (2.6) — -5.2% 2 SOG
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 47.0% 1.57 23.6 (3.2) — -8.2% 4 SOG
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 -120 51.7% 46.6% 2.35 17.7 (3.4) — -20.2% 2 SOG
BUF vs FLA 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -160 45.4% 45.5% 2.53 25.6 (4.0) — -11.2% 4 SOG
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -130 49.1% 44.2% 2.23 20.3 (3.4) — -19.0% 2 SOG
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -165 42.2% 44.0% 2.55 19.2 (3.2) — -3.1% 1 SOG
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -145 45.8% 42.8% 2.26 18.2 (3.1) — -14.3% 0 SOG
BUF vs FLA 12:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -140 45.5% 41.9% 1.32 14.9 (2.3) — -14.2% 3 SOG
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 1.5 +125 -165 41.7% 40.1% 1.33 21.3 (2.2) — -9.8% 3 SOG
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 1.5 +130 -175 40.6% 39.8% 1.34 21.4 (0.8) — -8.5% 2 SOG
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 39.3% 0.97 12.3 (0.2) UNDER best +18.4% W 0 SOG · +0.95u
FLA @ BUF 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 37.9% 2.08 18.6 (2.6) — -12.9% 3 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 59.7% 2.02 18.1 (3.2) — -7.1% 2 SOG
OTT @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 58.6% 1.94 17.3 (2.9) — -10.5% 2 SOG
OTT @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 58.1% 2.09 20.2 (3.1) — -4.5% 1 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 54.0% 1.84 23.8 (2.8) — -7.4% 4 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +105 56.9% 52.7% 1.63 14.8 (1.5) — -18.0% 4 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -160 +105 55.8% 51.1% 2.53 17.7 (1.6) — -17.0% 1 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -125 48.5% 49.0% 1.70 14.8 (1.1) — -6.4% 2 SOG
OTT @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 46.5% 1.54 17.3 (1.1) — -9.3% 1 SOG
OTT @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -125 49.5% 45.6% 1.43 22.8 (0.9) — -16.5% 0 SOG
OTT @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 45.3% 1.35 12.5 (0.8) UNDER lean +4.4% W 1 SOG · +0.91u
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +100 -130 46.9% 42.7% 1.33 13.0 (1.7) — -14.6% 1 SOG
OTT @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 40.7% 2.20 17.6 (2.5) — -12.5% 1 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +105 -175 43.4% 40.5% 3.11 20.5 (3.5) — -16.9% 2 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 38.4% 2.15 20.3 (3.4) — -11.7% 1 SOG
OTT @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 36.8% 1.96 25.8 (2.5) — -15.4% 2 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -190 38.4% 35.9% 2.02 20.5 (2.0) — -12.0% 3 SOG
NJD vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 34.7% 1.88 16.4 (2.2) — -18.5% 0 SOG
OTT @ NJD 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -185 39.1% 33.7% 1.81 19.1 (2.1) UNDER lean +2.1% W 1 SOG · +0.54u
MIN vs VGK 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +150 62.5% 64.7% 2.41 29.9 (3.8) — -3.0% 2 SOG
MIN vs VGK 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 60.6% 2.16 17.4 (1.9) — -5.8% 1 SOG
VGK @ MIN 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 55.6% 1.85 16.8 (1.1) — -8.6% 3 SOG
VGK @ MIN 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +115 57.5% 55.3% 1.82 14.3 (3.4) — -12.1% 0 SOG
MIN vs VGK 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -125 -115 51.0% 50.4% 2.72 20.7 (3.1) — -9.4% 3 SOG
VGK @ MIN 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 50.1% 1.70 22.7 (1.7) — -6.4% 1 SOG
VGK @ MIN 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 47.7% 1.62 16.9 (1.1) — -6.9% 1 SOG
MIN vs VGK 7:00 PM CT 3.5 +105 -145 45.2% 42.0% 3.14 22.5 (3.6) — -13.9% 3 SOG
VGK @ MIN 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -165 42.2% 41.7% 2.35 21.1 (3.6) — -8.4% 2 SOG
VGK @ MIN 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -160 44.2% 39.8% 2.10 19.4 (3.5) — -18.5% 2 SOG
VGK @ MIN 7:00 PM CT 3.5 +110 -170 43.1% 38.9% 2.94 21.7 (3.7) — -18.3% 2 SOG
VGK @ MIN 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -155 45.1% 37.3% 1.84 13.4 (3.1) UNDER lean +3.1% W 0 SOG · +0.65u
MIN vs VGK 7:00 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 37.0% 2.71 22.6 (3.6) UNDER best +6.4% L 4 SOG · -1.00u
MIN vs VGK 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -230 37.4% 35.2% 1.99 15.9 (1.9) — -15.5% 2 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.