← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
9
Lines priced
119
Best bets
8
Leans
15
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Best Bets

Aaron Ekblad
FLA @ PHI · 6:00 PM CT · D
UNDER 1.5
Price+145
Model46.5%
Book38.2%
EV+14.0%
Fair+115
Stake2.4%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 1.57 SOG · 23.9 min (2.2 PP) role change W 1 SOG · +1.45u
Jared McCann
SEA @ NYI · 6:30 PM CT · F
UNDER 2.5
Price+130
Model48.0%
Book40.9%
EV+10.5%
Fair+108
Stake2.0%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 2.57 SOG · 18.1 min (2.2 PP) W 2 SOG · +1.30u
Matthew Tkachuk
FLA @ PHI · 6:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 2.5
Price+130
Model47.3%
Book40.6%
EV+8.9%
Fair+111
Stake1.7%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 2.60 SOG · 18.2 min (3.4 PP) role change L 4 SOG · -1.00u
Brent Burns
CAR vs COL · 6:00 PM CT · D
UNDER 1.5
Price+140
Model44.4%
Book38.9%
EV+6.4%
Fair+125
Stake1.2%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 1.76 SOG · 20.7 min (1.4 PP) W 1 SOG · +1.40u
Sam Bennett
FLA @ PHI · 6:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 2.5
Price-110
Model55.4%
Book49.0%
EV+5.8%
Fair-124
Stake1.6%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 2.29 SOG · 17.2 min (2.0 PP) role change W 1 SOG · +0.91u
Sam Reinhart
FLA @ PHI · 6:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 2.5
Price+100
Model52.9%
Book46.5%
EV+5.8%
Fair-112
Stake1.4%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 2.38 SOG · 20.0 min (3.2 PP) role change L 4 SOG · -1.00u
Tage Thompson
BUF vs WPG · 6:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 3.5
Price-105
Model53.9%
Book48.0%
EV+5.3%
Fair-117
Stake1.4%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 3.31 SOG · 18.4 min (2.6 PP) W 3 SOG · +0.95u
Brandon Montour
SEA @ NYI · 6:30 PM CT · D
UNDER 2.5
Price+105
Model51.3%
Book45.5%
EV+5.1%
Fair-105
Stake1.2%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 2.48 SOG · 22.8 min (2.6 PP) W 1 SOG · +1.05u

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
WPG @ BUF 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +120 57.8% 57.8% 2.01 14.9 (1.7) — -7.2% 1 SOG
BUF vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 54.2% 1.80 13.3 (1.6) — -11.9% 2 SOG
WPG @ BUF 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 54.1% 1.78 14.9 (1.9) — -11.0% 3 SOG
WPG @ BUF 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 51.9% 1.68 21.7 (1.7) — -12.4% 2 SOG
BUF vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 50.9% 1.63 22.3 (1.9) — -12.8% 1 SOG
BUF vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 50.8% 2.69 18.7 (2.7) — -10.1% 3 SOG
BUF vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 49.9% 2.71 19.5 (2.3) — -4.8% 3 SOG
BUF vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 47.3% 2.63 17.9 (2.6) — -5.5% 3 SOG
BUF vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -125 -105 52.0% 46.1% 3.31 18.4 (2.6) UNDER best +5.3% W 3 SOG · +0.95u
WPG @ BUF 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -155 42.8% 40.7% 2.28 24.6 (3.1) — -10.5% 3 SOG
BUF vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 39.6% 2.29 15.6 (2.6) — -6.9% 5 SOG
WPG @ BUF 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -190 38.9% 38.7% 2.24 20.9 (2.9) — -7.1% 2 SOG
WPG @ BUF 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +130 -175 40.6% 38.6% 3.08 20.3 (3.0) — -11.2% 4 SOG
WPG @ BUF 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +150 -200 37.5% 36.7% 2.14 18.2 (3.0) — -8.3% 2 SOG
MTL vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 59.6% 3.15 18.1 (3.1) — -6.3% 6 SOG
MTL vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 58.6% 2.01 24.1 (3.0) — -6.9% 2 SOG
NSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 57.4% 2.94 17.7 (3.5) — -10.8% 5 SOG
MTL vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 56.5% 1.98 13.5 (1.8) — -3.1% 2 SOG
NSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 54.5% 1.81 12.4 (1.7) — -9.2% 1 SOG
MTL vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 52.1% 1.84 16.3 (3.0) — -6.2% 2 SOG
NSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -150 +110 55.8% 51.6% 3.62 19.3 (3.5) — -14.0% 4 SOG
NSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +105 54.1% 49.8% 2.57 17.6 (4.0) UNDER lean +2.9% L 3 SOG · -1.00u
NSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +115 -155 43.4% 39.4% 3.06 25.1 (3.7) — -15.4% 1 SOG
NSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 39.2% 2.11 21.2 (1.6) — -15.6% 1 SOG
MTL vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 38.1% 2.24 19.8 (3.1) — -6.6% 2 SOG
OTT vs DET 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 63.3% 2.26 19.2 (2.3) — -4.3% 2 SOG
OTT vs DET 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 55.0% 1.88 15.9 (1.4) — -7.0% 2 SOG
DET @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 53.3% 1.83 15.0 (1.6) — -5.7% 2 SOG
DET @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.2% 1.76 24.7 (2.9) — -8.8% 2 SOG
DET @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -145 +110 55.4% 52.7% 2.73 20.1 (3.3) — -11.0% 2 SOG
OTT vs DET 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 48.3% 2.70 20.9 (3.4) — -3.4% 3 SOG
DET @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 44.8% 2.38 16.4 (3.0) — -12.6% 1 SOG
OTT vs DET 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 44.2% 2.46 17.8 (3.2) — -9.5% 2 SOG
OTT vs DET 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 41.9% 2.22 21.7 (2.0) — -14.2% 1 SOG
DET @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 41.6% 2.32 17.0 (3.1) — -10.5% 3 SOG
OTT vs DET 6:00 PM CT 4.5 +125 -170 41.4% 38.9% 3.97 18.0 (3.5) — -12.4% 3 SOG
OTT vs DET 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 38.0% 2.14 17.6 (3.1) — -12.7% 5 SOG
DET @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 37.0% 2.05 18.5 (3.2) — -16.9% 0 SOG
OTT vs DET 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 36.9% 2.08 24.4 (3.5) — -13.2% 1 SOG
SJS @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 58.7% 2.12 19.2 (2.7) — -3.4% 2 SOG
TBL vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 57.4% 2.00 16.7 (1.8) — -6.8% 5 SOG
TBL vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 56.7% 1.87 12.1 (0.4) — -9.9% 3 SOG
TBL vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 54.8% 3.00 22.7 (3.5) — -4.5% 3 SOG
TBL vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 54.7% 2.96 20.3 (3.9) — -4.8% 2 SOG
SJS @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +105 54.1% 51.6% 2.70 19.5 (2.7) — -10.1% 4 SOG
SJS @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.8% 1.76 19.7 (2.3) — -6.8% 0 SOG
SJS @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 45.3% 2.51 15.9 (2.6) — -7.1% 0 SOG
TBL vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -115 -115 50.0% 44.8% 2.36 22.9 (3.5) UNDER lean +3.2% W 1 SOG · +0.87u
SJS @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 42.6% 2.41 18.7 (1.8) — -6.4% 2 SOG
TBL vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +135 -180 39.8% 40.2% 3.27 21.0 (3.7) — -5.4% 5 SOG
SJS @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -155 42.8% 38.0% 2.06 22.1 (2.0) UNDER lean +2.0% W 2 SOG · +0.65u
TBL vs SJS 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 37.8% 2.15 19.4 (1.9) — -11.3% 3 SOG
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 56.6% 1.86 15.9 (1.6) — -11.9% 3 SOG
PHI vs FLA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 54.3% 1.85 16.2 (3.2) — -7.0% 1 SOG
PHI vs FLA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +115 56.3% 53.9% 2.77 20.6 (2.9) — -10.2% 3 SOG
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 53.5% 1.57 23.9 (2.2) UNDER best +14.0% W 1 SOG · +1.45u
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -160 +120 57.5% 52.7% 2.63 17.9 (2.5) UNDER lean +4.0% W 2 SOG · +1.20u
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 52.7% 2.60 18.2 (3.4) UNDER best +8.9% L 4 SOG · -1.00u
PHI vs FLA 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 52.4% 1.72 24.7 (1.6) — -11.4% 3 SOG
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 52.4% 1.68 23.0 (0.5) UNDER lean +2.3% L 2 SOG · -1.00u
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 -105 52.5% 49.6% 1.62 15.7 (1.2) — -12.3% 1 SOG
PHI vs FLA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 49.2% 2.54 15.3 (2.5) — -12.9% 3 SOG
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 47.1% 2.38 20.0 (3.2) UNDER best +5.8% L 4 SOG · -1.00u
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 44.6% 2.29 17.2 (2.0) UNDER best +5.8% W 1 SOG · +0.91u
FLA @ PHI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 41.9% 2.21 19.5 (3.0) UNDER lean +2.7% W 2 SOG · +0.77u
PHI vs FLA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 40.6% 2.32 19.0 (2.2) — -8.7% 1 SOG
PHI vs FLA 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -200 38.0% 35.9% 2.04 16.5 (2.2) — -12.2% 3 SOG
COL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 64.3% 2.35 22.2 (2.7) — -2.7% 2 SOG
CAR vs COL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 55.7% 1.76 20.7 (1.4) UNDER best +6.4% W 1 SOG · +1.40u
COL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -155 +115 56.7% 54.7% 3.88 23.4 (4.0) — -10.0% 3 SOG
COL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.2% 2.80 22.7 (4.1) — -8.8% 4 SOG
CAR vs COL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 52.2% 1.68 19.5 (3.7) — -13.1% 1 SOG
CAR vs COL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +115 56.3% 51.7% 2.65 18.5 (3.6) UNDER lean +3.8% W 2 SOG · +1.15u
CAR vs COL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 50.1% 2.60 17.2 (3.5) UNDER lean +2.2% L 4 SOG · -1.00u
COL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 49.1% 2.54 25.9 (3.7) — -13.1% 3 SOG
CAR vs COL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 48.6% 2.48 19.9 (3.6) UNDER lean +2.8% L 3 SOG · -1.00u
COL @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -150 44.3% 41.9% 2.28 19.9 (3.3) — -12.0% 2 SOG
CAR vs COL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -135 45.9% 40.8% 2.17 18.8 (3.5) UNDER lean +3.1% L 6 SOG · -1.00u
SEA @ NYI 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 58.0% 1.87 21.1 (2.2) UNDER lean +2.9% L 2 SOG · -1.00u
SEA @ NYI 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 55.7% 1.84 17.5 (2.1) — -11.6% 1 SOG
NYI vs SEA 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -160 +120 57.5% 54.6% 2.81 20.0 (2.4) — -11.2% 2 SOG
SEA @ NYI 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -170 +130 59.2% 52.0% 2.57 18.1 (2.2) UNDER best +10.5% W 2 SOG · +1.30u
NYI vs SEA 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 52.0% 1.77 16.3 (1.8) — -8.1% 3 SOG
NYI vs SEA 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -135 +100 53.5% 49.3% 2.54 17.9 (2.3) — -14.3% 2 SOG
SEA @ NYI 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 48.8% 2.48 22.8 (2.6) UNDER best +5.1% W 1 SOG · +1.05u
NYI vs SEA 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 47.0% 2.50 17.5 (2.1) — -10.4% 2 SOG
NYI vs SEA 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 45.4% 2.38 18.4 (2.3) — -13.4% 4 SOG
NYI vs SEA 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 37.9% 2.11 22.7 (2.4) — -14.7% 5 SOG
SEA @ NYI 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 37.1% 2.08 17.6 (2.1) — -14.7% 1 SOG
SEA @ NYI 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 36.4% 1.96 14.9 (1.8) UNDER lean +3.4% W 2 SOG · +0.63u
STL @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 60.3% 2.00 20.4 (2.8) — -8.7% 4 SOG
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 58.4% 2.01 18.0 (2.3) — -5.1% 2 SOG
STL @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 58.1% 1.91 15.7 (1.4) — -10.5% 1 SOG
STL @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 56.8% 1.88 16.5 (2.4) — -9.7% 2 SOG
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 56.7% 1.91 23.9 (2.4) — -8.9% 2 SOG
STL @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 56.6% 1.95 17.8 (2.2) — -5.7% 2 SOG
STL @ CGY 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -160 +120 57.5% 54.4% 2.79 17.5 (2.6) — -11.5% 0 SOG
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -125 -105 52.0% 47.6% 2.46 18.7 (2.2) UNDER lean +2.3% W 0 SOG · +0.95u
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 45.4% 2.50 19.0 (2.1) — -6.9% 6 SOG
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -130 47.5% 43.6% 2.34 23.1 (2.4) — -14.8% 3 SOG
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 41.4% 3.19 18.5 (2.6) — -13.2% 4 SOG
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 39.8% 2.17 16.5 (1.8) — -14.5% 3 SOG
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 38.7% 2.20 16.5 (0.7) — -12.9% 0 SOG
CGY vs STL 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 34.3% 1.91 14.9 (1.5) UNDER lean +2.2% W 0 SOG · +0.56u
CBJ @ EDM 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 60.2% 2.00 17.8 (1.5) — -9.0% 2 SOG
CBJ @ EDM 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 59.9% 2.05 17.8 (2.2) — -7.7% 1 SOG
CBJ @ EDM 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 57.5% 2.93 26.6 (2.5) — -10.5% 2 SOG
CBJ @ EDM 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 56.9% 1.88 16.8 (1.6) — -10.7% 2 SOG
CBJ @ EDM 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 56.6% 1.86 15.6 (2.0) — -10.1% 0 SOG
EDM vs CBJ 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -145 +110 55.4% 54.2% 2.88 21.7 (4.0) — -8.5% 2 SOG
EDM vs CBJ 8:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.9% 2.85 23.7 (3.9) — -7.7% 2 SOG
EDM vs CBJ 8:00 PM CT 3.5 -110 -120 49.0% 49.8% 3.77 22.5 (3.8) — -5.0% 1 SOG
CBJ @ EDM 8:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +100 53.5% 47.8% 1.48 15.4 (2.0) UNDER lean +4.4% L 4 SOG · -1.00u
EDM vs CBJ 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 42.4% 2.31 13.9 (1.1) — -13.0% 3 SOG
EDM vs CBJ 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 42.4% 2.35 19.7 (3.8) — -8.8% 4 SOG
CBJ @ EDM 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 41.9% 2.21 17.7 (2.3) — -16.3% 1 SOG
EDM vs CBJ 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 41.5% 2.22 21.0 (1.0) — -14.8% 3 SOG
EDM vs CBJ 8:00 PM CT 3.5 +120 -160 42.5% 41.0% 3.21 18.6 (3.7) — -9.8% 5 SOG
EDM vs CBJ 8:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -155 42.8% 40.1% 2.18 22.1 (1.2) — -11.8% 2 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.