← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
3
Lines priced
49
Best bets
0
Leans
1
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
MTL vs WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 62.3% 2.28 19.6 (3.2) — -3.1% 5 SOG
WSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +120 57.8% 59.6% 2.16 19.6 (2.7) — -4.3% 1 SOG
MTL vs WSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -165 +125 58.4% 58.5% 3.10 19.1 (3.1) — -6.0% 11 SOG
WSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 58.3% 2.13 23.5 (2.9) — -2.8% 2 SOG
WSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +120 57.2% 57.3% 1.99 16.0 (1.1) — -5.8% 1 SOG
WSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 57.1% 2.01 17.1 (3.1) — -4.9% 2 SOG
MTL vs WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 55.7% 1.99 15.5 (1.4) — -4.5% 4 SOG
WSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 52.6% 1.85 14.1 (0.3) — -5.4% 1 SOG
MTL vs WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 51.9% 1.96 26.1 (1.6) — +1.3% 3 SOG
WSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 51.6% 1.87 17.4 (2.3) — -3.5% 0 SOG
MTL vs WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 44.3% 1.34 12.7 (1.5) UNDER lean +2.1% W 1 SOG · +0.83u
MTL vs WSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 43.9% 2.53 22.1 (4.0) — -3.4% 3 SOG
WSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -105 -130 47.5% 42.4% 3.08 17.3 (3.9) — -17.2% 2 SOG
WSH @ MTL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 40.1% 2.35 22.0 (2.4) — -5.7% 3 SOG
NJD vs CAR 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 63.2% 2.29 20.3 (3.2) — -4.4% 3 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 59.2% 2.12 16.1 (1.8) — -3.9% 2 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 57.7% 2.09 16.6 (2.5) — -2.6% 2 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +105 54.1% 54.7% 1.92 17.1 (2.6) — -4.7% 5 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 53.7% 1.93 16.0 (2.3) — -3.3% 1 SOG
NJD vs CAR 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 53.3% 1.82 19.3 (2.3) — -5.7% 3 SOG
NJD vs CAR 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 -105 52.5% 51.5% 2.72 18.4 (3.0) — -8.8% 3 SOG
NJD vs CAR 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 50.9% 1.77 16.2 (2.3) — -4.9% 3 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 47.7% 1.55 17.9 (1.6) — -10.8% 1 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 46.8% 1.56 19.8 (3.1) — -8.7% 0 SOG
NJD vs CAR 7:00 PM CT 1.5 +110 -150 44.3% 46.2% 1.66 16.9 (0.7) — -2.9% 2 SOG
NJD vs CAR 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 45.9% 2.51 21.3 (2.7) — -8.2% 2 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 +100 -135 46.5% 45.6% 1.53 18.6 (0.8) — -8.8% 2 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -130 47.5% 45.3% 2.42 19.5 (3.0) — -11.5% 1 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 1.5 +140 -185 39.1% 42.4% 1.60 14.5 (1.7) — +1.6% 1 SOG
NJD vs CAR 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 41.3% 2.36 20.1 (3.3) — -7.1% 3 SOG
CAR @ NJD 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -155 42.8% 40.2% 2.19 19.5 (3.0) — -11.5% 4 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +140 60.9% 62.0% 2.23 15.5 (1.1) — -4.5% 3 SOG
LAK @ EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 61.6% 2.25 16.3 (1.1) — -5.0% 2 SOG
LAK @ EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 61.2% 2.20 17.0 (0.6) — -4.8% 2 SOG
LAK @ EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 60.9% 2.23 17.7 (1.2) — -2.1% 1 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 59.9% 2.24 23.8 (1.3) — -2.6% 1 SOG
LAK @ EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 58.0% 2.13 20.3 (2.2) — -3.3% 1 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 56.2% 2.09 14.6 (0.8) — -0.7% 4 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 55.9% 1.94 20.7 (1.6) — -5.6% 3 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 55.1% 2.03 18.6 (3.1) — -0.8% 2 SOG
LAK @ EDM 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +115 56.7% 54.6% 2.84 19.5 (2.9) — -10.2% 3 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -145 +110 55.4% 53.8% 2.78 21.1 (3.7) — -9.2% 4 SOG
LAK @ EDM 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +115 56.7% 53.7% 2.73 18.2 (2.9) — -11.6% 7 SOG
LAK @ EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 49.6% 1.76 17.1 (2.8) — -5.3% 2 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 48.9% 2.70 24.1 (3.4) — -4.6% 4 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 48.3% 2.85 19.2 (2.8) — -0.9% 3 SOG
LAK @ EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 +115 -155 43.4% 43.2% 1.48 24.2 (2.1) — -7.0% 4 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 +125 -165 41.7% 41.6% 1.42 13.9 (1.9) — -6.3% 0 SOG
EDM vs LAK 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +130 -175 40.6% 36.6% 2.86 20.8 (3.8) — -15.9% 3 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.