← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
4
Lines priced
72
Best bets
1
Leans
0
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Best Bets

Phillip Danault
LAK vs EDM · 9:00 PM CT · F
OVER 1.5
Price+115
Model49.0%
Book43.4%
EV+5.4%
Fair+104
Stake1.2%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 1.92 SOG · 19.5 min (1.3 PP) L 0 SOG · -1.00u

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 62.2% 2.24 16.9 (2.5) — -5.0% 1 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 62.0% 2.22 20.0 (3.3) — -5.3% 2 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 61.0% 2.15 17.4 (3.0) — -7.0% 0 SOG
TOR vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 60.1% 2.24 21.6 (3.4) — -1.2% 2 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 60.0% 2.23 24.9 (1.9) — -2.5% 1 SOG
TOR vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 59.4% 2.16 19.2 (3.2) — -3.4% 6 SOG
TOR vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +105 54.1% 54.9% 1.92 13.4 (1.1) — -4.4% 0 SOG
TOR vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -145 +110 55.4% 54.0% 2.83 18.4 (3.2) — -8.8% 2 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 52.9% 1.88 15.0 (1.6) — -4.8% 1 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 51.7% 1.75 18.3 (0.6) — -7.0% 1 SOG
TOR vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -135 +100 53.5% 50.6% 3.60 20.1 (3.4) — -11.9% 3 SOG
TOR vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 49.0% 1.68 21.5 (1.6) — -6.5% 0 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -125 -105 52.0% 48.2% 3.40 17.5 (2.9) — -13.3% 5 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +110 -145 44.6% 44.5% 1.53 17.4 (1.5) — -6.6% 2 SOG
TOR vs OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -150 43.7% 42.7% 2.37 17.3 (2.7) — -8.3% 3 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +145 -195 38.2% 40.2% 1.48 13.3 (1.7) — -1.6% 1 SOG
OTT @ TOR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -185 39.6% 39.1% 2.24 25.5 (3.4) — -8.0% 0 SOG
NJD @ CAR 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 62.6% 2.23 20.7 (3.0) — -5.3% 4 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 60.9% 2.10 15.6 (1.9) — -7.1% 3 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 58.4% 2.00 17.4 (3.0) — -8.3% 3 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 54.1% 1.91 15.5 (2.2) — -4.3% 3 SOG
NJD @ CAR 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.5% 2.82 19.5 (2.8) — -8.2% 5 SOG
NJD @ CAR 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.8% 1.70 18.7 (1.9) — -6.9% 1 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 49.9% 1.72 19.3 (1.7) — -6.7% 3 SOG
NJD @ CAR 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 47.9% 1.63 15.3 (2.4) — -8.6% 1 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 -105 -125 48.0% 46.1% 1.52 17.4 (0.8) — -10.1% 2 SOG
NJD @ CAR 6:30 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.7% 2.42 21.7 (2.6) — -10.8% 2 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +105 -135 45.9% 45.3% 1.52 18.9 (3.4) — -7.1% 3 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 45.1% 2.38 19.3 (3.4) — -9.8% 3 SOG
NJD @ CAR 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +110 -145 44.6% 44.8% 1.56 16.5 (0.5) — -5.9% 2 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +115 -155 43.4% 43.0% 1.48 14.4 (1.5) — -7.5% 0 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +115 -150 43.7% 41.6% 2.26 19.6 (3.6) — -10.5% 7 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +125 -165 41.7% 41.2% 1.42 20.8 (0.3) — -7.3% 2 SOG
NJD @ CAR 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +140 -190 38.9% 40.2% 2.36 20.0 (3.2) — -3.6% 6 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 1.5 +130 -170 40.9% 39.9% 1.36 14.8 (0.2) — -8.1% 2 SOG
CAR vs NJD 6:30 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 38.6% 2.19 16.5 (2.9) — -9.4% 9 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 63.6% 2.46 19.7 (2.8) — -0.1% 3 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 60.4% 2.10 21.3 (2.4) — -6.0% 2 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 60.4% 2.16 16.5 (1.3) — -4.1% 2 SOG
MIN @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 60.2% 2.12 16.6 (1.2) — -5.4% 0 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 58.2% 3.05 17.3 (2.6) — -9.5% 5 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 58.1% 2.05 22.4 (2.1) — -4.5% 4 SOG
MIN @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 57.8% 2.96 21.0 (2.4) — -10.1% 2 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 2.5 -150 +110 55.8% 57.7% 3.23 20.6 (3.1) — -3.9% 5 SOG
MIN @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 57.1% 1.99 18.6 (2.5) — -6.1% 1 SOG
MIN @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 54.5% 3.01 22.2 (2.5) — -3.6% 3 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 50.5% 1.74 22.3 (0.9) — -5.5% 2 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 50.0% 1.75 16.4 (1.1) — -4.6% 0 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 49.5% 1.77 14.5 (0.3) — -3.3% 1 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 48.8% 1.65 14.8 (1.0) — -6.8% 1 SOG
MIN @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 +115 -155 43.4% 46.8% 1.73 26.9 (1.1) — +0.7% 2 SOG
VGK vs MIN 8:30 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.5% 2.41 17.3 (2.7) — -11.1% 2 SOG
MIN @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 1.5 +115 -155 43.4% 44.1% 1.53 21.7 (1.0) — -5.3% 1 SOG
MIN @ VGK 8:30 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 40.5% 3.01 22.1 (2.5) — -15.0% 5 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 66.1% 2.67 18.5 (2.4) — 0.0% 6 SOG
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 64.1% 2.37 18.9 (1.2) — -3.1% 3 SOG
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 63.0% 2.34 17.9 (0.5) — -4.7% 1 SOG
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 62.0% 2.24 20.8 (2.4) — -4.5% 2 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 60.3% 2.14 23.6 (1.1) — -5.2% 2 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +125 58.6% 58.0% 1.97 13.8 (1.0) — -7.9% 1 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +105 54.1% 57.8% 2.20 15.6 (0.7) — +0.7% 5 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +120 57.2% 56.4% 3.01 22.6 (3.6) — -7.2% 2 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 56.2% 1.94 21.4 (1.4) — -5.1% 2 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -165 +125 58.4% 56.1% 2.91 22.2 (3.6) — -9.9% 2 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 56.0% 1.92 18.5 (3.0) — -6.7% 3 SOG
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 51.1% 1.71 16.7 (3.0) — -8.0% 2 SOG
EDM @ LAK 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 49.6% 2.76 24.5 (3.3) — -5.3% 2 SOG
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 +115 -155 43.4% 49.0% 1.92 19.5 (1.3) OVER best +5.4% L 0 SOG · -1.00u
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 46.8% 1.58 25.7 (2.1) — -8.7% 1 SOG
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 43.5% 2.56 17.7 (1.1) — -2.2% 6 SOG
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +120 -160 42.5% 39.4% 3.01 19.5 (3.1) — -13.3% 3 SOG
LAK vs EDM 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +135 -180 39.8% 37.1% 2.92 19.9 (3.0) — -12.7% 2 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.