← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
6
Lines priced
91
Best bets
3
Leans
6
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Best Bets

Logan Stanley
WPG @ SJS · 3:00 PM CT · D
UNDER 1.5
Price+125
Model49.5%
Book41.7%
EV+11.3%
Fair+102
Stake2.3%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 1.34 SOG · 19.2 min (1.5 PP) role change L 5 SOG · -1.00u
Cutter Gauthier
ANA vs CGY · 7:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 3.5
Price+105
Model52.8%
Book45.5%
EV+8.2%
Fair-112
Stake1.9%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 3.09 SOG · 17.0 min (2.8 PP) L 9 SOG · -1.00u
Kiefer Sherwood
SJS vs WPG · 3:00 PM CT · F
UNDER 2.5
Price+115
Model49.1%
Book43.4%
EV+5.5%
Fair+104
Stake1.2%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10+
Proj 2.45 SOG · 18.1 min (2.3 PP) L 3 SOG · -1.00u

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +130 59.7% 61.5% 2.25 20.1 (3.4) — -4.4% 0 SOG
PIT vs VGK 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 61.3% 2.11 23.4 (3.0) — -7.2% 1 SOG
PIT vs VGK 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 57.3% 1.82 14.5 (1.3) — -10.9% 4 SOG
PIT vs VGK 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 54.0% 1.75 14.8 (1.6) — -10.0% 3 SOG
PIT vs VGK 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 51.4% 1.73 15.0 (2.2) — -7.5% 2 SOG
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 51.2% 2.61 17.3 (3.2) — -12.2% 3 SOG
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 50.2% 1.61 16.5 (0.9) — -9.6% 0 SOG
PIT vs VGK 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -105 -130 47.5% 50.1% 1.87 23.1 (1.8) — -2.2% 3 SOG
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 1.5 +100 -130 46.9% 49.2% 1.81 22.3 (1.3) — -1.5% 2 SOG
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 1.5 +100 -130 46.9% 48.1% 1.74 22.4 (0.9) — -3.8% 1 SOG
PIT vs VGK 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 47.0% 2.49 18.3 (2.9) — -10.2% 2 SOG
PIT vs VGK 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -115 -115 50.0% 47.0% 2.41 18.8 (2.9) — -12.1% 2 SOG
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 3.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.0% 3.27 20.9 (3.5) — -12.2% 0 SOG
PIT vs VGK 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 43.2% 2.39 18.1 (3.0) — -9.3% 3 SOG
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 41.7% 2.22 17.5 (3.4) — -12.4% 1 SOG
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 37.6% 2.06 22.9 (2.0) — -11.7% 1 SOG
VGK @ PIT 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 36.0% 2.03 19.2 (3.3) — -11.9% 2 SOG
CHI @ UTA 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 61.1% 2.17 18.5 (3.4) — -6.0% 2 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 60.0% 2.22 16.5 (2.2) — -3.6% 3 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 59.9% 1.98 16.8 (1.3) — -9.4% 2 SOG
CHI @ UTA 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 59.2% 2.10 17.6 (3.1) — -4.9% 0 SOG
CHI @ UTA 3:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +115 56.3% 54.7% 2.86 20.2 (3.5) — -8.8% 4 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +115 56.7% 54.7% 2.81 18.5 (3.7) — -10.0% 2 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 50.8% 1.83 13.1 (1.4) — -2.9% 2 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 49.8% 2.51 19.3 (3.6) — -11.9% 0 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 49.3% 1.56 20.3 (1.6) — -11.2% 2 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 3.5 -115 -115 50.0% 45.0% 3.10 17.3 (3.6) UNDER lean +2.9% W 2 SOG · +0.87u
CHI @ UTA 3:00 PM CT 1.5 +135 -180 39.8% 43.4% 1.66 17.4 (0.4) OVER lean +2.1% L 1 SOG · -1.00u
CHI @ UTA 3:00 PM CT 1.5 +115 -155 43.4% 41.6% 1.37 19.6 (0.3) — -10.5% 1 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 40.2% 2.12 15.8 (3.0) — -13.6% 0 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 38.3% 2.07 24.3 (3.5) — -13.9% 2 SOG
UTA vs CHI 3:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -190 38.4% 37.3% 2.14 16.8 (2.1) — -8.5% 1 SOG
WPG @ SJS 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +150 62.5% 63.0% 2.26 19.1 (3.2) — -5.4% 0 SOG
SJS vs WPG 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 60.2% 2.14 17.2 (2.8) — -4.5% 5 SOG
SJS vs WPG 3:00 PM CT 3.5 -135 +105 54.1% 51.1% 3.60 21.9 (3.8) — -11.0% 0 SOG
SJS vs WPG 3:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +115 56.7% 50.9% 2.45 18.1 (2.3) UNDER best +5.5% L 3 SOG · -1.00u
WPG @ SJS 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 50.5% 1.34 19.2 (1.5) UNDER best +11.3% L 5 SOG · -1.00u
SJS vs WPG 3:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +100 53.5% 50.0% 1.55 20.6 (3.1) — -13.1% 1 SOG
WPG @ SJS 3:00 PM CT 3.5 -110 -125 48.5% 48.6% 3.67 22.4 (3.3) — -7.3% 2 SOG
SJS vs WPG 3:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 44.7% 2.38 18.4 (3.3) — -10.6% 4 SOG
WPG @ SJS 3:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 43.2% 2.13 15.2 (2.6) UNDER lean +2.3% L 5 SOG · -1.00u
SJS vs WPG 3:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 42.5% 2.24 15.0 (3.1) — -12.9% 3 SOG
WPG @ SJS 3:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -190 38.4% 39.4% 2.38 22.1 (3.3) — -3.4% 0 SOG
STL @ MIN 4:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +150 62.5% 62.2% 2.15 18.4 (2.4) — -6.8% 2 SOG
STL @ MIN 4:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 58.5% 1.86 21.1 (2.2) — -10.7% 1 SOG
MIN vs STL 4:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 58.2% 1.90 25.2 (1.2) — -9.5% 2 SOG
MIN vs STL 4:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 55.2% 1.79 14.7 (1.9) — -10.3% 1 SOG
STL @ MIN 4:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +110 55.8% 54.0% 2.78 16.5 (2.4) — -10.0% 3 SOG
STL @ MIN 4:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 52.2% 1.84 18.3 (2.5) — -4.4% 3 SOG
MIN vs STL 4:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 51.6% 2.84 27.7 (4.0) — -5.5% 2 SOG
MIN vs STL 4:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 49.1% 2.44 17.0 (3.1) — -13.1% 3 SOG
MIN vs STL 4:00 PM CT 3.5 -125 -110 51.5% 48.1% 3.37 21.9 (3.9) — -13.4% 5 SOG
STL @ MIN 4:00 PM CT 1.5 +115 -155 43.4% 46.5% 1.77 16.7 (1.8) — +0.0% 0 SOG
STL @ MIN 4:00 PM CT 1.5 +110 -150 44.3% 46.3% 1.69 15.4 (2.1) — -2.7% 1 SOG
STL @ MIN 4:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 43.0% 2.40 16.6 (1.8) — -7.6% 2 SOG
MIN vs STL 4:00 PM CT 3.5 +105 -140 45.5% 41.9% 3.09 19.4 (3.7) — -14.1% 1 SOG
MIN vs STL 4:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 40.8% 2.28 17.9 (1.9) — -8.1% 1 SOG
STL @ MIN 4:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 39.1% 2.22 17.0 (2.0) — -8.2% 2 SOG
MIN vs STL 4:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -175 40.6% 38.7% 2.15 19.1 (3.6) — -11.0% 3 SOG
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 1.5 -200 +150 62.5% 63.0% 2.23 17.8 (2.1) — -5.6% 0 SOG
NYI vs FLA 5:30 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 60.6% 2.06 20.8 (2.0) — -7.5% 1 SOG
NYI vs FLA 5:30 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 59.3% 3.09 21.5 (3.5) — -7.7% 3 SOG
NYI vs FLA 5:30 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 57.0% 2.00 16.9 (2.3) — -6.3% 0 SOG
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 55.4% 2.66 18.0 (3.4) UNDER lean +4.7% L 3 SOG · -1.00u
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 54.7% 1.82 13.2 (1.1) — -8.8% 1 SOG
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 2.5 -125 -105 52.0% 51.5% 2.77 18.1 (2.9) — -7.3% 4 SOG
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 47.0% 2.53 20.7 (3.5) — -8.3% 4 SOG
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 1.5 +100 -135 46.5% 46.9% 1.63 23.5 (1.3) — -6.2% 3 SOG
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 45.0% 2.39 17.1 (1.9) — -10.1% 2 SOG
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 43.5% 2.25 15.7 (2.9) — -13.0% 1 SOG
NYI vs FLA 5:30 PM CT 2.5 +130 -180 40.4% 41.9% 2.45 20.3 (3.6) — -3.7% 5 SOG
FLA @ NYI 5:30 PM CT 2.5 +120 -160 42.5% 40.4% 2.20 16.9 (2.0) — -11.1% 3 SOG
NYI vs FLA 5:30 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 39.4% 2.20 24.9 (3.5) — -11.5% 5 SOG
NYI vs FLA 5:30 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 37.0% 2.13 14.3 (2.2) — -9.3% 1 SOG
ANA vs CGY 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +140 60.9% 59.4% 1.96 17.1 (1.5) — -8.5% 4 SOG
ANA vs CGY 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +145 62.0% 59.1% 1.87 22.9 (0.9) — -11.4% 2 SOG
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +145 62.0% 58.3% 1.84 14.5 (2.0) UNDER lean +2.3% L 2 SOG · -1.00u
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 57.3% 2.86 18.8 (2.8) — -10.8% 7 SOG
ANA vs CGY 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 56.9% 2.07 25.0 (3.0) — -3.8% 4 SOG
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +105 54.1% 54.1% 1.87 16.6 (0.9) — -5.8% 2 SOG
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 51.7% 1.77 15.2 (1.9) — -7.0% 4 SOG
ANA vs CGY 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 51.5% 2.59 18.3 (2.9) — -11.7% 0 SOG
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 47.3% 2.40 17.0 (2.7) — -13.2% 4 SOG
ANA vs CGY 7:00 PM CT 3.5 -140 +105 54.5% 47.2% 3.09 17.0 (2.8) UNDER best +8.2% L 9 SOG · -1.00u
ANA vs CGY 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.2% 2.36 18.9 (2.9) — -11.7% 4 SOG
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 44.0% 2.30 18.3 (1.8) — -12.1% 3 SOG
ANA vs CGY 7:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 42.6% 2.12 15.5 (2.1) UNDER lean +3.4% W 0 SOG · +0.80u
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 38.2% 2.15 16.3 (1.4) — -10.4% 3 SOG
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 37.8% 2.09 22.6 (2.5) — -11.1% 0 SOG
ANA vs CGY 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 37.7% 2.01 16.7 (2.9) — -15.1% 0 SOG
CGY @ ANA 7:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -185 39.1% 36.0% 1.96 16.9 (2.0) — -13.6% 1 SOG

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.