← Models / SOG Model

How the Shots on Goal Model Works

What it does

For every player Hard Rock Bet posts a shots-on-goal line for, the model simulates the game 10,000 times and counts how often the player goes over. That gives a probability for every shot count (0, 1, 2 … 10+) — the bars under each pick — and the probability of going over Hard Rock's line.

Model vs Sim: the probability the picks use (Model) blends the simulation with Hard Rock's own de-vigged price, weighted 35% simulation / 65% market. In a two-season backtest the simulation alone was about as accurate as the closing line, but the blend was measurably more accurate than either — each knows things the other doesn't. The weight is re-fitted every week on graded results. Sim (in each row's detail) is the raw simulation.

How a simulation works

  • Game script — each simulated game draws how many power plays each team gets, how the score unfolds (from Hard Rock's moneyline and total), whether a trailing team pulls its goalie late, and whether it goes to 3-on-3 overtime. Every player on a team shares the same script, so a power-play-heavy night lifts the whole PP unit together.
  • Ice time — the player's share of his team's even-strength, power-play, penalty-kill, 6-on-5 and overtime minutes, from his recent deployment, plus a realistic random swing drawn from real games (including nights cut short by injury).
  • Shot rate — shots per 60 minutes in each situation, estimated from his history and pulled toward forward/defenseman norms when the sample is small. Adjusted for the opponent's shot suppression, the arena's scorekeeper tendencies, home ice, back-to-backs, and score state (trailing teams shoot more).

Reading the board

  • Book — Hard Rock's probability for the over with the vig removed.
  • Model — the model's probability for the over (simulation blended with the market, see above).
  • Proj — average simulated shots; TOI — expected minutes (power-play minutes in brackets).
  • EV — expected profit per 1 unit bet at Hard Rock's price on the model's side.
  • Fair — the price at which the bet would break even by the model.

Best bets & leans

Best bet: EV of at least 5% and the model at least 4 percentage points away from the de-vigged line. Lean: EV of at least 2%. Only lines with both an over and an under price can be picks. Stake is 0.25× Kelly as a share of bankroll — a sizing guide, not a promise.

Settlement & timing

Graded like the sportsbooks grade it: overtime counts, shootouts don't, and a player who doesn't take a shift is a void. Predictions refresh every 30 minutes on game days as lines move and lock at puck drop; the locked prediction is what gets graded. Every pick is tracked on Pick history and Performance, including how the line moved after the pick (CLV).

Honest expectations

Shots on goal are noisy — a 3-shot-per-game player still goes under 2.5 often. The model aims to be well calibrated, not to call every game. Results before live tracking come from a walk-forward backtest priced at Hard Rock's closing lines, using only information available before each game.

Informational only. Not betting advice.

Games
9
Lines priced
122
Best bets
0
Leans
6
Updated
Oct 19, 6:03 AM CT
backtest · priced at close

Full Board

PlayerGameLineOverUnder BookModelProjTOI (PP) PickEVResult
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +125 58.4% 57.3% 1.90 15.4 (1.4) — -8.0% 2 SOG
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 57.2% 1.91 14.0 (1.7) — -10.1% 3 SOG
CHI @ FLA 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +110 55.8% 57.2% 2.00 24.4 (2.5) — -4.7% 0 SOG
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 56.9% 2.97 19.2 (3.3) — -10.6% 5 SOG
CHI @ FLA 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 56.2% 2.00 18.3 (2.5) — -0.6% 3 SOG
CHI @ FLA 12:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 54.8% 1.93 14.9 (2.0) — -3.1% 2 SOG
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -145 +110 55.4% 54.1% 2.85 16.7 (1.8) — -8.5% 3 SOG
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +115 56.3% 52.4% 2.70 16.4 (3.1) UNDER lean +2.4% L 9 SOG · -1.00u
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 +100 53.1% 49.9% 2.60 19.1 (3.1) — -11.8% 4 SOG
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -130 46.9% 46.3% 2.52 19.7 (3.2) — -7.5% 3 SOG
CHI @ FLA 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 44.5% 2.49 21.3 (2.8) — -6.7% 3 SOG
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 40.5% 2.27 21.9 (0.4) — -8.8% 1 SOG
FLA vs CHI 12:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -190 38.9% 34.0% 1.93 22.9 (2.9) — -18.3% 4 SOG
NYR @ BOS 2:30 PM CT 1.5 -200 +145 62.0% 64.5% 2.40 17.8 (1.9) — -3.3% 2 SOG
BOS vs NYR 2:30 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 60.9% 2.15 17.8 (1.8) — -5.3% 0 SOG
NYR @ BOS 2:30 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 59.7% 2.07 17.7 (2.9) — -8.0% 4 SOG
BOS vs NYR 2:30 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 57.3% 2.05 20.0 (3.0) — -1.8% 1 SOG
BOS vs NYR 2:30 PM CT 3.5 -155 +120 57.2% 56.3% 4.08 20.7 (3.8) — -7.4% 6 SOG
BOS vs NYR 2:30 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 56.2% 1.94 17.6 (3.1) — -5.1% 1 SOG
BOS vs NYR 2:30 PM CT 1.5 -130 -105 52.5% 54.3% 1.92 23.2 (3.0) — -3.9% 2 SOG
NYR @ BOS 2:30 PM CT 1.5 -135 +105 54.1% 52.4% 1.74 22.6 (3.2) — -8.8% 0 SOG
BOS vs NYR 2:30 PM CT 2.5 -115 -115 50.0% 47.3% 2.48 18.5 (3.3) — -11.7% 2 SOG
NYR @ BOS 2:30 PM CT 2.5 +115 -155 43.4% 42.6% 2.38 20.1 (3.1) — -8.3% 3 SOG
NYR @ BOS 2:30 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 38.1% 2.23 17.0 (3.0) — -6.6% 1 SOG
NYR @ BOS 2:30 PM CT 3.5 +135 -180 39.8% 36.0% 2.89 20.2 (3.2) — -15.3% 2 SOG
OTT vs MIN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +140 61.1% 65.1% 2.42 19.9 (3.2) — -0.6% 3 SOG
OTT vs MIN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 63.5% 2.38 18.8 (2.9) — -0.3% 6 SOG
OTT vs MIN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -185 +135 60.4% 61.4% 2.18 23.3 (2.2) — -5.4% 2 SOG
OTT vs MIN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 59.9% 2.10 18.5 (1.6) — -5.8% 1 SOG
OTT vs MIN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 59.1% 2.04 23.2 (3.1) — -7.1% 5 SOG
OTT vs MIN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 57.4% 2.01 17.9 (2.4) — -4.3% 2 SOG
MIN @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 56.1% 1.95 14.4 (1.3) — -5.3% 3 SOG
MIN @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 -105 52.5% 53.0% 2.88 20.8 (3.0) — -6.3% 4 SOG
MIN @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -110 -120 49.0% 52.7% 1.93 18.3 (2.6) — +0.7% 1 SOG
OTT vs MIN 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 52.7% 1.86 16.4 (2.5) — -5.2% 2 SOG
OTT vs MIN 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.5% 3.73 19.0 (3.0) — -7.4% 9 SOG
MIN @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +120 -165 42.2% 41.9% 2.38 20.7 (3.2) — -7.9% 1 SOG
MIN @ OTT 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +135 -180 39.8% 37.9% 3.05 19.8 (3.1) — -11.0% 3 SOG
TBL vs NYI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 58.9% 2.04 17.3 (1.4) — -4.3% 0 SOG
TBL vs NYI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 58.8% 2.05 19.6 (1.2) — -7.6% 1 SOG
NYI @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -195 +145 61.8% 57.4% 1.82 19.7 (1.5) UNDER lean +4.5% L 5 SOG · -1.00u
NYI @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -115 -115 50.0% 52.3% 1.88 17.3 (1.3) — -2.3% 2 SOG
NYI @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 51.5% 2.79 19.7 (2.6) — -5.6% 3 SOG
TBL vs NYI 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 50.6% 1.59 20.7 (2.0) UNDER lean +3.8% L 4 SOG · -1.00u
TBL vs NYI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -130 47.5% 49.7% 2.77 21.3 (2.3) — -3.0% 2 SOG
NYI @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 49.5% 2.75 19.9 (2.7) — -3.4% 2 SOG
TBL vs NYI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -150 44.3% 46.6% 2.64 18.9 (2.8) — -2.1% 7 SOG
TBL vs NYI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 46.2% 2.52 19.0 (2.9) — -9.9% 4 SOG
TBL vs NYI 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 45.6% 3.54 23.1 (3.6) — -4.3% 3 SOG
NYI @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -190 38.4% 41.6% 2.45 17.3 (2.3) — +2.0% 2 SOG
NYI @ TBL 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -185 39.6% 41.4% 2.43 18.8 (2.4) — -2.8% 5 SOG
TBL vs NYI 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -180 39.8% 39.2% 2.23 23.9 (2.3) — -7.9% 2 SOG
PIT vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -175 +130 59.4% 59.1% 2.06 16.2 (2.9) — -7.2% 2 SOG
PIT vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 58.9% 2.07 23.9 (2.2) — -3.2% 2 SOG
NSH @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 57.7% 2.02 18.9 (2.9) — -3.8% 0 SOG
PIT vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -150 +115 56.3% 55.8% 1.91 14.6 (1.9) — -7.1% 2 SOG
PIT vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 55.0% 1.84 14.4 (0.4) — -9.5% 0 SOG
NSH @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 54.7% 1.87 21.0 (1.6) — -6.2% 2 SOG
PIT vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -130 -105 52.5% 54.2% 2.97 20.8 (3.3) — -4.1% 4 SOG
NSH @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +110 55.8% 54.1% 2.87 17.9 (3.3) — -9.8% 5 SOG
NSH @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.7% 2.86 25.1 (3.2) — -7.9% 3 SOG
PIT vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 50.8% 2.81 19.8 (2.8) — -3.0% 2 SOG
PIT vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 49.6% 2.73 19.7 (2.9) — -3.1% 6 SOG
NSH @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -115 -115 50.0% 45.3% 3.26 17.9 (3.2) UNDER lean +2.3% W 3 SOG · +0.87u
PIT vs NSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 42.5% 2.28 22.0 (2.3) — -15.1% 3 SOG
NSH @ PIT 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +130 -170 40.9% 38.6% 2.18 17.3 (3.1) — -11.2% 1 SOG
WPG @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -160 +120 57.5% 58.4% 2.08 23.5 (2.8) — -5.1% 3 SOG
WSH vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 56.4% 2.00 17.0 (1.9) — -3.3% 0 SOG
WSH vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 55.7% 1.94 23.1 (3.1) — -4.6% 1 SOG
WSH vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 55.2% 1.97 17.2 (3.1) — -2.3% 3 SOG
WPG @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 54.7% 1.97 15.7 (1.7) — -1.6% 0 SOG
WPG @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +115 56.3% 53.8% 2.80 19.8 (2.9) — -10.3% 2 SOG
WPG @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 53.4% 1.83 17.2 (2.8) — -5.6% 1 SOG
WSH vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -135 +100 53.5% 53.2% 1.81 17.4 (0.3) — -7.4% 3 SOG
WSH vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.7% 1.74 16.7 (1.5) — -7.1% 5 SOG
WPG @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -120 -110 51.0% 49.5% 1.63 14.6 (1.8) — -9.3% 2 SOG
WPG @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +100 -135 46.5% 43.7% 2.35 15.8 (2.6) — -12.6% 2 SOG
WSH vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 40.4% 3.10 18.0 (4.2) — -15.1% 2 SOG
WSH vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -185 39.1% 37.7% 2.15 18.7 (2.7) — -9.6% 2 SOG
WSH vs WPG 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +140 -190 38.9% 37.4% 2.16 21.5 (3.0) — -10.2% 2 SOG
WPG @ WSH 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -190 38.4% 36.6% 2.09 19.3 (2.8) — -10.3% 0 SOG
CAR vs LAK 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -190 +145 61.6% 58.5% 1.94 21.4 (1.7) — -10.8% 4 SOG
LAK @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 56.7% 1.97 16.7 (0.5) — -4.3% 3 SOG
LAK @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -130 +100 53.1% 54.3% 1.89 17.2 (1.1) — -3.9% 2 SOG
LAK @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 53.2% 1.78 16.2 (1.6) — -10.1% 5 SOG
LAK @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 52.8% 1.80 18.6 (2.2) — -4.9% 0 SOG
CAR vs LAK 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -150 +110 55.8% 52.8% 2.74 21.9 (3.7) — -12.0% 4 SOG
CAR vs LAK 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 52.0% 1.69 16.4 (1.6) — -10.8% 3 SOG
LAK @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 48.6% 2.57 19.4 (2.4) — -11.0% 4 SOG
CAR vs LAK 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -105 -125 48.0% 45.7% 2.49 20.6 (3.2) — -10.8% 2 SOG
LAK @ CAR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 44.1% 2.47 18.2 (3.1) — -7.4% 3 SOG
CAR vs LAK 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 41.1% 2.24 19.3 (3.2) — -13.8% 0 SOG
EDM vs TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -200 +145 62.0% 63.4% 2.29 14.7 (0.9) — -4.8% 2 SOG
EDM vs TOR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -180 +135 60.2% 61.6% 3.34 23.1 (3.5) — -4.2% 9 SOG
EDM vs TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -165 +120 57.8% 60.7% 2.19 22.3 (1.0) — -2.6% 4 SOG
TOR @ EDM 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -155 +120 57.2% 60.4% 3.33 21.4 (2.9) — -0.6% 5 SOG
EDM vs TOR 6:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 59.8% 2.03 18.2 (3.5) — -7.1% 2 SOG
EDM vs TOR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -140 +105 54.5% 57.7% 3.19 19.8 (3.5) — -1.0% 3 SOG
EDM vs TOR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 57.7% 3.02 22.2 (3.6) — -9.3% 6 SOG
EDM vs TOR 6:00 PM CT 2.5 -120 -110 51.0% 50.6% 2.73 23.5 (3.5) — -7.3% 8 SOG
TOR @ EDM 6:00 PM CT 3.5 -115 -115 50.0% 48.4% 3.58 20.6 (2.7) — -9.4% 7 SOG
TOR @ EDM 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +110 -150 44.3% 47.8% 1.74 22.0 (1.7) — +0.4% 2 SOG
TOR @ EDM 6:00 PM CT 1.5 +105 -140 45.5% 47.4% 1.65 22.6 (1.2) — -2.9% 0 SOG
TOR @ EDM 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -165 41.7% 44.5% 2.57 17.9 (1.5) — +0.1% 1 SOG
TOR @ EDM 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +125 -170 41.4% 42.9% 2.46 18.1 (2.4) — -3.5% 0 SOG
TOR @ EDM 6:00 PM CT 2.5 +145 -195 38.2% 38.8% 2.29 22.3 (2.6) — -4.9% 3 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -210 +155 63.3% 63.5% 2.26 23.7 (2.4) — -6.2% 4 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -175 +130 59.4% 61.1% 3.34 19.3 (2.4) — -4.0% 4 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 59.6% 2.13 19.3 (2.5) — -1.9% 2 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -170 +130 59.2% 59.4% 2.06 17.4 (2.3) — -5.6% 2 SOG
DET @ CGY 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -180 +135 60.2% 59.2% 1.99 26.1 (3.2) — -7.9% 0 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -155 +115 56.7% 55.9% 1.91 14.8 (1.0) — -8.1% 0 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 54.5% 1.84 22.8 (1.7) — -7.9% 4 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -125 -105 52.0% 54.0% 1.91 15.3 (2.1) — -2.8% 3 SOG
DET @ CGY 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -140 +105 54.5% 53.5% 1.83 15.4 (1.9) — -8.2% 3 SOG
DET @ CGY 9:00 PM CT 1.5 -145 +110 55.4% 51.2% 1.64 15.6 (1.2) UNDER lean +2.5% W 0 SOG · +1.10u
DET @ CGY 9:00 PM CT 2.5 -110 -120 49.0% 49.1% 2.67 17.7 (3.1) — -6.3% 2 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +105 -140 45.5% 43.9% 2.41 18.0 (1.7) — -10.1% 3 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +110 -145 44.6% 43.3% 2.40 16.9 (2.2) — -9.0% 1 SOG
CGY vs DET 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +135 -185 39.6% 40.8% 2.38 18.7 (1.8) — -4.2% 0 SOG
DET @ CGY 9:00 PM CT 2.5 +115 -150 43.7% 40.8% 2.25 18.9 (3.0) — -12.4% 2 SOG
DET @ CGY 9:00 PM CT 3.5 +110 -145 44.6% 39.2% 2.97 20.2 (3.1) UNDER lean +2.8% W 3 SOG · +0.69u

Click a row for the shot distribution and model inputs. Hard Rock lines only. Model fitted through 2026-10-18.